IAN PLIMER
Posted on: December 10, 2021
IAN PLIMER IS PROFESSOR EMERITUS OF EARTH SCIENCES AND AUTHOR OF THE BOOKS {GREEN MURDER} AND {HEAVEN AND EARTH GLOBAL WARMING THE MISSING SCIENCE}.
THIS POST IS A STUDY OF THE IAN PLIMER ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE SCIENCE AS SUMMARIZED IN THE ARTICLE LINKED BELOW.
LINK TO SOURCE: https://politicom.com.au/climate-scientists-admit-to-lying-cheating-fraud/?fbclid=IwAR0Klq_B4Y65aC6zjWxBq4Zb_rMT3Fdkcx-VjebtI1s0S2aFWhNC-wasPC0
PART-1: WHAT THE IAN PLIMER ARTICLE SAYS
ACCORDING to green activists, climate change policies don’t need to be costed because they’re a moral issue. Do green activists have a household budget? Whether it’s their own money or that of taxpayers, there has to be fiscal responsibility. Climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data.
Climate change predictions are based on computer models that have consistently failed. What is touted today as “progressive” is in reality a regressive drift back to the Dark Ages. Green activists are able to get away with murder because they are unchallenged. The first moral issue is that climate activists ignore the evidence of the totality of integrated Earth systems and of history. They refuse to debate, they do not analyse data, resort to fraud, do not consider the consequences of their policies and they don’t really care about the damage their policies create.
FUTILITY: The second real moral issue is their futility trying to engineer a climate within a narrow range having no understanding of the impact to the environment to the diversity of flora and fauna and to the damage of so many Western countries. This damage is treated as mere detritus on the path to salvation. Taxpayer-funded climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data and conclusions.This is the seed of the whole corrupt climate change business.
Their antics are not expensive amusement but the destruction of the 2500 year-old scientific method which is a way of finding a truth. Climate “scientists” remain unchallenged by a fawning scientifically illiterate politicised media. For hundreds of thousands of years, humans and other organisms have adapted and flourished to great and rapid natural climate changes. Surely adaptation by an advanced technological society would be easier.
Climate change predictions are based on computer models that have consistently failed over the past 40 years when compared with the reality of actual measurements. The end result of changing the whole energy system based on this nonsense is an energy crisis. During the time I was writing my book Green Murder, the coal price rose 100 per cent and LNG price 500 per cent. Don’t tell me that fossil fuels are on the path to extinction. They are needed for survival.
The new green religion is a doomsday cult where the naïve and gullible seek salvation through the veneration of cruciform wind turbines and “settled science” that has replaced Scripture as the new religion. Fire and brimstone preachers cancel, de-platform and abuse those who question green dogma with all the savagery that was used by the Spanish inquisitors to root out heretics. What is touted today as “progressive” is in reality a regressive drift back to the Dark Ages with its misery, poverty and ignorance. {RELATED POST: LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/10/11/anthropogenic-global-warming-in-a-post-modern-world/ }
The greens are not a soft cuddly feel-good political movement trying to make the planet a better place. Their green propaganda appeals to many of the young and well off. It is a communist-inspired destructive hypocritical western movement that destroys democracy and cares not for the environment. By their actions and consequences, greens kill people. There is nothing virtuous or admirable about being green.
With wind and solar electricity, someone always loses. These are the people on struggle street who cannot afford to pay the increasing electricity costs, especially when they face long-term unemployment as a result of COVID-19 virus lockdowns. It is immoral, unnecessary, futile and anti-human. There is a move now from European socialists, the UN and COP participants that the freedom losses experienced with COVID-19 lockdowns should be extended and that all citizens should have a climate passport where every atom of carbon used will be on a register to be monitored and taxed. This is communism. Cui bono.
Net-zero is a mindless meaningless slogan. It is undefined. What exactly is net-zero? What do we use? What don’t we use? Where is the due diligence? If it means no fossil fuel use then we go back 200 hundred years. We’ve been there. Endless mud, dung, shortened lives, disease, no heating, no cooling, nothing of the modern world and no hope.
Some EU leaders are telling us that under net-zero we will own nothing and be happy. I call this communist slavery. We’ve been there before and it all failed at great cost. Net-zero has no costings and you can bet your bottom dollar, because that’s all you’ll have left, that your money will make the green billionaires even wealthier. Net-zero is a cooked-up recipe for economic and social chaos, class division and further destruction of the west and its values. RELATED POST: LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/11/03/the-net-zero-fallacy/
The collapse in the values of Western civilisation is a far greater threat than climate change or China. There is no need for a Chinese invasion or war, we are destroying and enslaving ourselves from within.In just one year, parts of the West have collapsed into an energy crisis of their own making. This is a window into net-zero. If such facts offend you, so be it. Take a daily teaspoon of cement to harden up, broaden your knowledge, reduce your biases and challenge your thinking. My book Green Murder contains facts underpinned by repeatable validated evidence and the scientific method. No matter how offended you might be, feelings are not evidence.
Green activists are able to get away with murder because they are unchallenged. Certa Bonum Certamen {FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT}. Don’t let them get away with it. In this book I charge the greens with murder. They murder humans who are kept in eternal poverty without coal-fired electricity.
PART-2: CRITICAL COMMENTARY
THE RELIGIOUS NATURE OF THE GREEN ECO WACKO MOVEMENT IS SOMETHING WE STRONGLY AGREE WITH AND SOMETHIING WE HAVE PRESENTED IN RELATED POSTS LINKED BELOW:
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/10/11/anthropogenic-global-warming-in-a-post-modern-world/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/11/22/tiimothy-morton-dark-ecology/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/05/27/unnatural-humans/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/02/15/divine-environmentalism/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/06/13/the-climate-religion/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/10/21/climate-change-and-religion/
THE FUNDAMENTAL IAN PLIMER HYPOTHESIS THAT THE CLIMATE MOVEMENT IS REALLY AN ACTIVISM MOVEMENT AND THAT THE CLIMATE CHANGE ISSUE IS JUST SOMETHING THAT THE MOVEMENT NEEDED IS SUPPORTED IN RELATED POSTS WHERE WE PRESENT THE CASE THAT THE MOVEMENT IS BEST UNDERSTOOD AS ANTI FOSSIL FUEL ACTIVISM
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/03/23/anti-fossil-fuel-activism-disguised-as-climate-science/
A CONTENTIOUS ISSUE IS THE IAM PLIMER ARGUMENTS AGAINST “NET ZERO”. IN RELATED POSTS WE SHOW THAT THE CLIMATE ACTION DEMANDED BY CLIMATE SCIENCE IS NOT “NET ZERO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS” BUT “ZERO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS”. THE NET ZERO PROPOSAL IS THAT FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS ARE POSSIBLE IF THEY ARE OFFSET WITH INVESTMENTS IN CARBON CYCLE INTERVENTIONS THAT WOULD REMOVE AN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT OF CO2 FROM THE ATMOSPHERE. THIS CLIMATE ACTION PROPOSAL DOES NOT COME FROM CLIMATE SCIENCE. IT IS A CORRUPTION OF THE CLIMATE SCIENCE DEMAND FOR ZERO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS.
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/11/03/the-net-zero-fallacy/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/02/25/net-zero/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/05/20/the-power-of-trees/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2019/09/30/cer/
THE IAN PLIMER CASE AGAINST CLIMATE SCIENCE THAT IT IS ACTIVISM AND NOT SCIENCE IS SUPPORTED IN RELATED POSTS WHERE WE PROVIDE SOME DETAILS OF THIS ISSUE.
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/04/13/the-science-of-climate-science-is-fear/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/05/29/fear-appeal-bibiography/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/07/22/fear-appeal-in-climate-change/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/09/02/an-obsessive-fear-of-carbon/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/09/20/our-inner-need-to-fear/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/04/13/the-science-of-climate-science-is-fear/
SOME DETAILS OF THE GENERALIZED ASSESSMENT BY PLIMER OF WEAKNESSES IN THE SCIENCE OF CLIMATE SCIENCE ARE PROVIDED IN RELATED POSTS.
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/05/18/climate-science-vs-statistics/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2019/07/28/rcb/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/08/26/a-mathematical-inconsistency/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/11/18/tcre-transient-climate-response-to-cumulative-emissions/
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/11/09/the-issue-is-human-cause/
THE ELITE CONSENSUS POLITICS ISSUE IN CLIMATE SCIENCE
LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/03/07/how-the-elite-subvert-democracy/
Thongchai Thailand 
Leave a Reply