{1}: QUORA QUESTION:

How worried are you that rising temperatures of global warming will have a significant impact on your life?

{2}: ANSWERED BY RYSZARD RAKOWSKI:

Not worried at all. Global warming is not an “existential threat”, it is a political and economic scam. IPCC and corrupt politicians should be jailed for perpetuating this lie.

{3}: COMMENT BY GARY KRAMER:

Rubbish! Please read the science and educate yourself.

#1 Read the IPCC AR6 – Sixth Assessment Report. The State of the Climate in 2020.

#2: UK climate change – Climate Change Committee,

#3: Canada Climate Change Report – Canada’s Changing Climate.

#4: Australia’s State of the Climate Report.

#5: Climate Change Scenarios for New Zealand.

#6: USA Climate Change Report –

#7: Global Climate Report – Annual 2020,

#8: GHG emissions – CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,

#9: Global temperatures- World of Change: Global Temperatures,

#10: Ice core data – Factcheck: What Greenland ice cores say about past and present climate change,

#11: More ice core data – CO2 Ice Core Data,

#12: CO2 emissions – CO2 emissions.

#13: IPCC Review In-depth Q&A: The IPCC’s sixth assessment report on climate science – Carbon Brief.

#14: If you believe that’s there’s a worldwide conspiracy then you are entitled to that belief. Unfortunately it has no basis in fact.

{4}: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE GARY KRAMER COMMENT.

(1) THE 6TH IPCC REPORT:

IF THE IPCC KNOWS THE CAUSE AND UNDERSTANDS THE EVOLUTION OF THE CURRENT WARMING TREND OF THE HOLOCENE INTERGLACIAL AS A CAUSE AND EFFECT PHENOMENON DRIVEN BY HUMAN ACTIVITY, WHY DO THEY NEED 6 REPORTS? IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE FIRST 5? ARE THOSE 5 REPORTS FALSEHOODS? DO THEY CONTAIN ERRORS THAT NEED CORRECTING?

IF SO WHAT ASSURANCE DO WE HAVE THAT THE 6TH VERSION OF THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN ERRORS OR THAT THE REPORT IS NOT A FALSEHOOD THAT WILL BE REVEALED TO US IN THE 7TH IPCC REPORT?

IN THAT CONTEXT IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IN WHAT THE IPCC HAS GIVEN US AS GOD GIVEN TRUTH THAT MUST NOT BE QUESTIONED, WE FIND KNOWN STATISTICAL ERRORS SUCH AS THE TCRE METRIC OF CLIMATE SCIENCE. OF THE MANY FALLACIES OF THE TCRE NOTED IN RELATED POSTS ON THIS SITE,, THE MOST EGREGIOUS IS THE MATHEMATICAL INCONSISTENCY ISSUE WHERE THE ECS AND THE TCRE ARE CLAIMED TO REPRESENT THE SAME UNDERLYING PHENOMENON BUT WITH MECHANISMS THAT ARE INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT.

THE IPCC PRESENTATION, THOUGHT TO BE TRUTH BY DEFINITION SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS THE THE IPCC, SUFFERS FROM THE AD HOMINEM FALLACY. WHAT’S MORE, THE REPORT CONTAINS SERIOUS METHODOLIGICAL AND STATISTICAL ERRORS DESCRIBED IN THESE LINKED DOCUMENTS:

LINK1: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/08/10/links-to-ipcc6-posts/ ,

LINK2: https://tambonthongchai.com/?s=MATHEMATICAL+INCONSISTENCY

(2): THE UK 2021 CLIMATE REPORT:

THIS REPORT SAYS THAT IT PRESENTS THREE KEY MESSAGES AS FOLLOWS: (1) Historic promisses: The Government has made historic climate promises in the past year, for which it deserves credit. However, it has been too slow to follow these with delivery. This defining year for the UK’s climate credentials has been marred by uncertainty and delay to a host of new climate strategies. Those that have emerged have too often missed the mark. With every month of inaction, it is harder for the UK to get on track.

(2): Progress on Net Zero: Lockdown measures led to a record decrease in UK emissions in 2020 of 13% from the previous year. Sustained reductions in emissions require sustained Government leadership, underpinned by a strong Net Zero Strategy: A Net Zero Test would ensure that all Government policy, including planning decisions, is compatible with UK climate targets.

(4): The big cross-cutting challenges of public engagement, fair funding and local delivery must be tackled.

CRITICAL COMMENTARY: WHAT WE SEE HERE IS THE POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND NO CIMATE SCIENCE EXCEPT FOR THE “NET ZERO STRATEGY” THAT VIOLATES CLIMATE SCIENCE. AS EXPLAINED IN A RELATED POST ON “WHAT DOES NET ZERO MEAN” WE SHOW THAT NET ZERO STRATEGIES VIOLATE THE CLIMATE SCIENCE OF CLIMATE ACTION. CLIMATE ACTION MEANS ZERO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS. NET ZERO MEANS WE CAN KEEP BURNING FOSSIL FUELS IF WE CANCEL IT OUT IN THE CARBON CREDITS MARKET OR IN CARBON CYCLE INTERVENTIONS. THESE STRATEGIES ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE CLIMATE ACTION DEMANDED BY CLIMATE SCIENCE WHICH CALLS FOR ZERO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS NOT “NET ZERO”. LINK TO RELATED POST ON “WHAT DOES NET ZERO MEAN?” https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/02/25/net-zero/

LINKS TO RELATED POST ON THE CLIMATE ACTION FLAW IN NET ZERO:

LINK#1: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/06/19/vegandiet/

LINK#2: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/05/20/the-power-of-trees/

(3): CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE:

Canada is doing a great job of putting into perspective the threat of climate change, as described in the latest IPCC report, in a Canadian context. The Canadian story is potentially more catastrophic then the global one. Canada has been warming at an estimated 1.7°C since 1948, or a little more than double the global average of 0.8°C. Furthermore, the report echo the IPCC finding that our emission need to be reduced drastically immediately to be able to reach net-zero in 2050. If we fail the consequence will be catastrophic with warming potentially reaching an average of 6.3°C and as high as 11°C in Northern Canada under a high emission scenario. It is important to remind ourselves that the temperature difference between the last ice age and now was about 4°C to 7°C and took 5 thousand years so a 6.3°C warming in 100 years is unprecedented and with potentially catstrophic consequences. With regards to the potential impact of a 6.3°C increase, the report predict that extreme temperature of the sort that occured every 50 years will now happen yearly. It also predicts that the Hudson Bay will most likely be ice free year round by 2050 let alone 2100. Furthermore, even under a medium emission scenario the report predict that Most small ice caps and ice shelves in the Canadian Arctic will disappear by 2100
Sea level change won’t escape our foolishness with decreases of up to 90 centimeters, and increases ranging from 50 centimetres on the Pacific coast to 1 meter on the Atlantic Coast. However the report reminds us that we are not only the cause of this problem but also the solution. Beyond the next few decades, the largest uncertainty about the magnitude of future climate change is rooted in uncertainty about human behaviour, that is, whether the world will follow a pathway of low, medium, or high emissions. As the previous IPCC report and our latest Canadian Food Guide reminds us our food choices have consequences, and will be an integral part of ever hoping to meet, let alone exceed, our goals of limiting temperature increase by 2100 to 1.5°C. Want to fight our climate emergency, loss of nature, global acidification, eutrophication, fresh water shortage, prevent pandemics, antibiotic resistance, health problems, save countless lives and much much more without the need to wait for government, corporations or technological innovation? Go vegan today! Contact us for help in your change of lifestyle and to link up with one of the many local communities in your area.

(4): SIMILAR NATIONAL CLIMATE ACTION PLANS ARE FOUND IN THE AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT REPORTS.

IN SUMMARY, THE CLIMATE ACTION REPORTS FROM BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, AND NEW ZEALAND, CITED AS CLIMATE SCIENCE, ARE IN REALITY NATIONAL LEVEL CLIMATE ACTION PLANS. YET, AS NOTED IN A RELATED POST, THE ONLY CLIMATE ACTION SOUGHT BY CLIMATE SCIENCE IS A GLOBALLY COORDINATED PROGRAM TO REDUCE GLOBAL FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS. THIS IS WHY THE UN WAS INVOLVED. IT WAS THOUGHT THAT THEY COULD PUT TOGEGHER THIS GLOBAL CLIMATE ACTION PLAN ALONG THE LINES OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL, THE SO CALLED “MONTREAL PROTOCOL FOR THE CLIMATE”. THAT THE UN HAS FAILED TO DELIVER THE “MONTREAL PROTOCOL FOR THE CLIMATE” DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CLIMATE ACTION HEROISM FOR NATION STATES. THERE ISN’T. IT HAS TO BE GLOBAL. CLIMATE ACTION HEROISM OF NATION STATES WILL NOT DELIVER THE REDUCTION IN GLOBAL FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS NEEDED AND DEMANDED BY CLIMATE SCIENCE AS DESCRIBED IN THESE RELATED POSTS.

LINK#1: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/02/23/renewable-energy-statistics/

LINK#2: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/05/22/climate-catch22/

LINK#3: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/08/21/cop26-glasgow-2021/