Thongchai Thailand


Posted on: August 5, 2021

QUESTION: Would letting existing forests reclaim vast swathes of the Earth be more effective for the climate rather than planting trillions of trees?

ANSWER: The tree option for climate action is flawed in multiple ways. For one thing there isn’t enough land on earth to make a meaningful difference in global photosynthesis. Also, the theory of anthropogenic global warming is not a carbon cycle thing but very specifically, a fossil fuel thing. If you believe the climate scientists do what they say and stop burning fossil fuels. If you don’t believe them tell them to go hug themselves. It serves no purpose to play silly carbon cycle games like planting trees or bragging about “NET zero” emissions that isn’t really zero emissions. The flaws in the carbon cycle intervention climate action idea are desribed in a related post linked below.


Planet Releaf – Planting One Million Trees

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • David: thank you very much for that information.......something I was unaware of....very interesting.....
  • Ruben Leon: 1st you write your opinion and then you search for other opinions to support your opinion and call your opinion science. I'm as sure that the orbit
  • Ruben Leon: People who believe CO2 is causing climate change are either ignorant of basic science or they don't believe in gravity. CO2 is 10% heavier than Cal
%d bloggers like this: