Thongchai Thailand

THE MICHAEL WAYNE BOX QUESTION

Posted on: May 19, 2021

A QUESTION FROM MICHAEL WAYNE BOX SAYS

I AM LOOKING FOR CLIMATOLOGY FORECASTS THAT ARE MORE THAN 10 YEARS OLD AND THAT MADE A PROJECTION THAT HAS SINCE COME TO PASS. I AM LOOKING FOR A MEASURABLE FORECAST THAT HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE MEASURABLY TRUE.

ANSWERS IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2021:

MAY 20: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 21: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 22: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 23: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 24: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 25: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 26: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 27: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 28: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 29: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 30: NO ANSWER YET

MAY 31: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 1: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 2: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 3: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 4: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 5: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 6: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 7: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 8: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 9: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 10: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 11: NO ANSWER YET

JUNE 11: NEW QUESTION BY MICHAEL:

Michael Wayne BoxMichael Wayne Box requested your answer
The warming of the planet and increased CO2 are both good for plants, many of which we eat. What result outweighs this benefit?
Potential climate change impacts | GRID-Arendal

8 Responses to "THE MICHAEL WAYNE BOX QUESTION"

Here’s one for the next 10 years… the amount of funding directed towards stopping runaway global warming will be inversely proportional to the amount of runaway global warming actually detected.

Thanks. I will pass that on to Michael.

May 22 update

No answer yet

Good luck with your search.

The molecular weight of a CO2 molecule is 44.
The molecular weight of an H2O molecule is 18.
The molecular weight of air is less than H2O. (14.3 more or less)

CO2 molecules precipitate out of the atmosphere as soon as they’re emitted — like hailstones.

If the “Climate Scientists” had the scientific training of Junior High student, they would know this — and they’d also know that the only way to transport millions of cubic miles of water from the ocean to the poles and higher altitudes — is to have lots of heat for thousands of years on a planet that’s 75% covered by water.

They would also know that as long as there was more precipitation than could burn off in the summer, the ice would accumulate and eventually turn into continental ice sheets, like the one’s that covered Siberia, Europe and North America 10,000+ years ago.

When the ice sheets started to melt away it would be natural to jump to the conclusion that it was because of Global Warming — when the exact opposite is true.

The ice sheets melted away because they were “starved” of precipitation — due to Global Cooling.

Thank you Ruben but what they are saying is that the molecular weight issue is a vertical distribution issue and nothing more.

The vertical distribution “issue” is the whole ballgame.

The entire “carbon footprint” argument is based on CO2 “polluting” our atmosphere by being pumped into it by humans using hydrocarbons.

This argument is false because the differential in molecular weight, the vertical distribution “issue”, makes it physically impossible for CO2 to remain in the atmosphere any more than hailstones can remain in the atmosphere.

To dismiss the scientific fact that completely negates the pseudo scientific argument of humans even contributing to Global Warming, much less actually causing it, is dishonest and childish.

The vertical distribution implies that co2 stays in the atmosphere

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: