Thongchai Thailand

CO2 AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Posted on: January 31, 2021

The science of carbon dioxide and climate

THIS POST IS A CRITICAL REVIEW OF AN ARTICLE IN THE CONVERSATION THAT THE CLIMATE SCIENCE OF ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING VIA CO2 IS SETTLED SCIENCE AND NOT A CONTROVERSY THAT NEEDS TO BE SETTLED. LINK: https://theconversation.com/co-levels-and-climate-change-is-there-really-a-controversy-119268 .

A Friendly Reminder From Pretty Much Every Climate Scientist in the World: Climate  Change Is Real | Smart News | Smithsonian Magazine

PART-1: WHAT THE SOURCE DOCUMENT SAYS ABOUT CO2 AND CLIMATE CHANGE

The relationship between atmospheric CO2 levels and climate change is often perceived as a controversial subject. While there’s no real disagreement among climate scientists – around 90% fully agree that human activity is clearly responsible for climate change – in the United States in 2016, barely 50% of the general public came to the same conclusion. Adding to the general confusion, highly active “climate-change deniers” claim that temperature has evolved independently of CO2 atmospheric concentrations through Earth’s history, and that therefore today’s rising CO2 levels are not an issue. So did scientists get the story wrong? No. CO2 has long contributed to controlling the Earth’s climate, and its rising concentration in the atmosphere and oceans is a major threat to humanity. Together with solar activity and albedo, greenhouse gases are a key part of Earth’s radiative budget and exert a strong control on surface temperature. Although water vapour is the primary greenhouse gas on Earth, CO2 draws much more attention because it can actively lead climate change. Unfortunately, human activity delivers CO2 to the atmosphere at a rate 70 times greater than all volcanoes on Earth combined. As a result, atmospheric CO2 concentration (or pCO2) increases and the surface of the Earth warms up at a pace that no natural factor can explain. We know that CO2 is a temperature control and we can demonstrate it in various ways. One of them is through the exploration of Earth’s history. Using rocks, fossils and their chemical and physical properties, geoscientists have reconstructed warm and cold periods throughout Earth’s history. To demonstrate the link between climate, temperature and pCO2 millions of years ago, we need to reconstruct each of them independently. To do so, we use climatic recorders called “proxies”. The isotopic composition of oxygen atoms, written δ¹⁸O, measured in ancient calcareous shells, is one of them. It allows us to reconstruct past seawater temperatures with a well-known degree of uncertainty that depends on analytical precision and how parameters such as seawater δ¹⁸O, salinity and pH also affect the δ¹⁸O of shells. Because geological history affects rocks and their signals, the further we go back in time, the larger are the uncertainties. We thus combine different proxies and formulate hypotheses that continually improve with years of research. Establishing such reconstructions is a slow, complicated (sometimes painful) process but they become more and more reliable every year as uncertainties decrease. If uncertainties are too large, interpretations rely on parsimony: the simplest model must be considered the likeliest. What matters is that scientists know how to estimate uncertainties, and share them. Overall, seawater temperature reconstructions agree with geological observations of climate history: major ice ages coincide with lower global temperature. In particular, δ¹⁸O indicate a steady cooling from 50 million years onwards, leading to the preindustrial climate. GEOCARB (version III) reconstruction of pCO₂ (yellow, one point every 10 million years) and average tropical sea surface temperature from δ¹⁸O of carbonates corrected for seawater pH changes assuming no δ¹⁸O changes for seawater (red) compared with geologically constrained cold periods (light blue) and glaciations (dark blue). The history of pCO2: Proxies exist for pCO2 as well. For instance, palaeontologists count stomata – apertures through which plants breathe, exchange moisture and take up CO2 for photosynthesis – on fossil leaves. The more CO2 is abundant, the fewer stomata are required. One factor that adds a degree of uncertainty is that plants have fewer stomata under drier climates and more under humid ones. Fossil leaves are rare and atmospheric pCO2 data are scarce for ancient periods of Earth. In the absence of (sufficient) data, numerical modelling helps explain data with a globally coherent approach that respects the fundamental laws of physics. One of the most famous is GEOCARB, a geological carbon cycle model developed to reconstruct pCO2 history by Robert Berner and his colleagues. On timescales greater than 100,000 years, pCO2 is primarily added from volcanoes, and lost through two carbon pumps: the biological pump and the carbonate pump. During photosynthesis, plants and algae take up CO2 to build their organic matter. When they die, this CO2 might get trapped in sediments. This is the biological pump. The carbonate pump is the coupling between weathering of continents and carbonate rock precipitation. CO2 acidifies surface waters that dissolve rocks. Dissolved elements are washed to the ocean where they are used to build calcareous material such as shells or corals, which eventually become limestones. Year after year, these pumps store CO2 away from the atmosphere. In the past, volcanoes could have been more or less active; continents were in different locations, which affected the carbon pumps. Berner and colleagues quantified how the otherwise known evolution of those parameters affected the carbon cycle and, therefore, atmospheric pCO2. They knew and displayed their model uncertainty. Their results should be presented with an estimation envelope, not as a given value. Times of higher pCO2 are warm periods. Conversely, decrease in atmospheric CO2 content triggered glacial periods such as of the Carboniferous and modern ice ages, with the possible exception of the Hirnantian (445 million years ago). Recent models suggest that for this remote period, the tectonic configuration played a specific role. How humans quickly affect climate. Temperature and pCO₂ reconstructions for the last 66 My. Temperatures are calculated using the δ¹⁸O of carbonates and are represented without their uncertainty. The pCO₂ reconstruction is based on seven different proxies in agreement within their respective uncertainties. Beerling and Royer, 2011., Author provided
Over the time period beginning at the point that dinosaurs went extinct (a relatively recent 66 My ago), geologists can rely on many temperature and CO2 proxies in addition to δ¹⁸O or fossil leaves. The closer we get to our era, the more proxies there are and the fewer the uncertainties are, until we can connect geological and ice core data that support each other. Tectonics modified oceanic circulation and led to the building of mountain ranges like the Himalayas. Both factors affected the carbon pumps and forced pCO2 to decrease, as shown by proxies and in agreement with the GEOCARB trends. This decrease in pCO2 led to the observed cooling and drove the Earth to the current glacial-interglacial alternation. We can determine from ice cores and proxies that pCO2 has been oscillating between 200 and 350 ppm for 2.6 million years and that it suddenly increased from 280 to 410 ppm between 1850 and 2018. pCO2 is heading toward levels unprecedented for 5, or even 30 million years, when the Earth was much warmer than today and no Atlantic ice caps were present. Reconstructions of temperature and pCO2 can offer us a glimpse into what lies ahead of us if we don’t slow down CO2 emissions. On long time scales, when pCO2 increases, warming stimulates the carbon pumps, thereby helping pCO2 to decrease. This negative feedback can act as a geological thermostat. Unfortunately, it is too slow to react rapidly enough to compensate for our fast emissions. On the timescale of a decade, warming aggravates CO2 release to the atmosphere. When temperature increases, oceans warm up and release dissolved CO2 to the atmosphere. For 2.6 million years, glacial and interglacial cycles have been forced by Earth’s orbital fluctuations and CO2 was only an internal positive feedback. Today, anthropogenic CO2 leads and amplifies the ongoing warming. Carbon cycle geological thermostat. The + means that the parameters are stimulated by an increase of the factor located before the arrow. The – means that the parameter is attenuated. For example, carbon pumps decrease atmospheric CO₂ while volcanic inputs increase it. Pierre-Henri Blard and Guillaume Paris. As a result of the pCO2 increase, the average surface temperature has already increased by almost 1°C between 1901 and 2012. The Earth’s surface has been much warmer than today in the past and it will eventually cool off.

However, the consequences of the short-term changes are disastrous. In addition to higher surface temperatures, extreme weather events, ocean acidification, ice melting and sea-level rise are about to significantly disrupt our daily lives and harms the ecosystems around us. Earth science helps us understand the past of our planet. We cannot control Earth’s orbit, tectonics or oceanic circulation but we can control our greenhouse-gas emissions. The future is for all of us to build.

Apocalypse now: Our bleak climate future | Newshub

PART-2: CRITICAL COMMENTARY

(1): The essence of the anthropogenic global warming case made in this article is that throughout our long geological history over billions of years, the paleo proxy data show that atmospheric CO2 concentration (ACC) and global mean surface temperature (GMST) rose and fell naturally at time scales of millions of years and through all these changes we see a positive correlation between ACC and GMST. Under high ACC conditions we see high GMST and under low ACC we see low GMST. These slow changes at long million year time scales are natural and they clearly establish the positive causal relationship between ACC and GMST where high GMST is seen at high ACC and low GMST is found at low ACC.

(2): In these slow natural changes in ACC in the paleo record what we find is that ACC varies between 200ppm and 350ppm at a very gentle pace over millions of years. These changes at geological time scales and between these the values of 200ppm and 350ppm are entirely natural.

(3): BUT what we see in the last century or so is an unprecedented rise in ACC from 280ppm to 410ppm at an unprecedented 100-year time scale. WHAT THESE PALEO DATA TELL US IS THAT THE CURRENT RISE IN CO2 IS TOO RAPID TO BE NATURAL AND THAT THEREFORE IT MUST BE HUMAN CAUSED BY WAY OF FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS.

(4): AT THE SAME TIME THE RISE IN ATMOSPHERIC CO2 TO ABOVE THE HISTORIC HIGH OF 350PPM ALL THE WAY UP TO 410PPM PUTS GLOBAL WARMING INTO UNCHARTED TERRITORY THAT PORTENDS CATACLYSMIC CONSEQUENCES OF GLOBAL WARMING NEVER BEFORE SEEN IN THE PALEO PROXY DATA.

(5): THESE FINDINGS ARE PRESENTED AS THE EVIDENCE THAT AGW IS A CLIMATE CRISIS AND THAT THE CLIMATE CRISIS IS IN FACT A CREATION OF THE HUMAN ACTIVITY OF BURNING FOSSIL FUELS THAT CAN AND MUST BE ATTENUATED WITH THE CLIMATE ACTION PRESCRIBED BY CLIMATE SCIENCE. THE PRESCRIPTION IS THAT WE MUST STOP BURNING FOSSIL FUELS.

(6): THAT THE CASE AGAINST FOSSIL FUELS IN THIS CENTURY CANNOT BE MADE WITH THE RELEVANT DATA FOR THIS CENTURY BUT REQUIRE PALEO PROXY DATA FROM MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO, DOES NOT SERVE AS EVIDENCE FOR THE CLAIMS MADE AGAINST FOSSIL FUELS. IT DOES JUST THE OPPOSITE. IT EXPOSES EMPIRICAL WEAKNESSES IN THE THEORY OF AGW.

(7): IN THE THEORY OF AGW, THE CASE AGAINST FOSSIL FUELS IS MADE WITH THE SO CALLED “AIRBORNE FRACTION” ARGUMENT. THE EMPIRICAL DATA SHOW THAT THE ANNUAL RISE IN ATMOSPHERIC CO2 CONCENTRATION (ACC) EQUALS ABOUT HALF OF THE ANNUAL CO2 FROM FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS (FFE). BASED ON THIS OBSERVATION, CLIMATE SCIENCE PROPOSES THAT THE OBSERVED RISE IN ACC IS CAUSED BY FFE BY WAY OF THE AIRBORNE FRACTION OF 50%, THAT IS HALF THE CO2 IN FFE STAYS IN THE ATMOSPHERE FOREVER AND CAUSES ACC TO RISE.

(8): WE NOTE HERE THAT THIS AIRBORNE FRACTION ARGUMENT IS A PRODUCT OF CIRCULAR REASONING AND CONFIRMATION BIAS AND YET IT SERVES AS THE FOUNDATIONAL EVIDENCE FOR HUMAN CAUSE IN CLIMATE SCIENCE WHERE THIS WARMING CYCLE OF THE HOLOCENE IS CLAIMED TO BE HUMAN CAUSED BY WAY OF FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS. IN A RELATED POSTS O THIS SITE, WE PRESENT THE RESULTS OF STATISTICAL TESTS OF THE AIRBORNE FRACTION HYPOTHESIS. LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/12/29/climate-scientist-explains-the-carbon-budget/

(9): THESE TESTS DO NOT PROVIDE THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE NEEDED FOR HUMAN CAUSE BY WAY OF FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS. SOME OF THE RELEVANT CHARTS ARE REPRODUCED BELOW. DETAILS OF THESE STATISTICAL TESTS ARE FOUND IN THE RELATED POST ON THE AIRBORNE FRACTION: LINK: https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/12/29/climate-scientist-explains-the-carbon-budget/

S15). CO 2 airborne fraction, AF, the ratio of annual observed... |  Download Scientific Diagram

(10): CONCLUSION:

DETRENDED CORRELATION ANALYSIS AND MONTE CARLO SIMULATION ARE USED TO STUDY THE RESPONSIVENESS OF ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION TO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS.

NO EVIDENCE IS FOUND TO SUPPORT THE ASSUMED CAUSATION IN CLIMATE SCIENCE WHERE THE OBSERVED RISE IN ATMOSPHERIC CO2 CONCENTRATION IS ATTRIBUTED TO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS. 

THE FINDINGS PRESENTED ABOVE IMPLY THAT THE AIRBORNE FRACTION IS A CREATION OF CIRCULAR REASONING AND CONFRMATION BIAS.

COP21: James Hansen, the father of climate change awareness, claims Paris  agreement is a 'fraud' | The Independent | The Independent

A STATEMENT FROM NASA GISS AND JAMES HANSEN ON THE PROBLEM WITH THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD

Scientific reticence hinders communication with the public about the dangers of global warming. It is important that policy-makers recognize the potential influence of this phenomenon. Scientific reticence may be a consequence of the scientific method. Success in science depends on objective skepticism. Scientific reticence has its merits. However, in a case such as ice sheet instability and sea level rise, there is a danger of excessive reticence. [LINK TO SOURCE DOCUMENT]

TRANSLATION: ADHEFRENCE TO UNBIASED OBJECTIVE SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY INTERFERES WITH CLIMATE ACTIVISM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: