Thongchai Thailand

RESPONSIVENESS OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 TO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS

Posted on: June 14, 2020

THIS POST IS A WORDPRESS VERSION OF AN ONLINE PDF DOCUMENT

[LINK TO THE SOURCE DOCUMENT]

RELATED POSTS ON THE ISSUE OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 [LINK] [LINK] 

 

RELATED POST:  AN EXCLUSIVE RELIANCE ON FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS OVERLOOKS NATURAL CARBON FLOWS. [LINK]  

Seeps Give a Peek Into Plumbing

RESPONSIVENESS OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 TO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS

JULY 2017

ABSTRACT: An essential and critical causation relationship in climate science is that changes in atmospheric CO2 are driven by fossil fuel emissions on a year by year basis. This causation relationship implies a responsiveness of atmospheric CO2 concentration to fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scaleA testable implication of the validity of this relationship is that changes in atmospheric CO2 should be correlated with fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale net of long term trends.A test of this relationship with insitu CO2 data from Mauna Loa 1958-2016 and flask CO2 data from twenty three stations around the world 1967-2015 is presented. The test fails to show that annual changes in atmospheric CO2 levels can be attributed to annual emissions. The finding is consistent with prior studies that found no evidence to relate the rate of warming to emissions

BACKGROUND: The essence of the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is that fossil fuel emissions cause warming by increasing atmospheric CO2 levels and that therefore the amount of warming can be attenuated by reducing fossil fuel emissions (Hansen, 1981) (Meinshausen, 2009) (Stocker, 2013) (Callendar, 1938) (Revelle, 1957) (Lacis, 2010) (Hansen, 2016) (IPCC, 2000) (IPCC, 2014). At the root of the proposed AGW causation chain is the ability of fossil fuel emissions to cause measurable changes in atmospheric CO2 levels at an annual time scale in excess of natural variability. Evidence for this relationship between emissions and atmospheric CO2 has been presented in terms of carbon dioxide flows derived from climate models (Sarmiento, 1998) (Canadell, 2007) (Bachelet, 2001) (Friedlingstein, 2006) (McGuire, 2001) (Bopp, 2002) (Chen, 2000) and also from global carbon budgets based on the assessment of “net flows”.

NET FLOWS: Net flows are differences between large uncertain flows but with the uncertainty removed by making certain assumptions. Net flows thus circumvent insurmountable measurement problems of large and uncertain gross flows with circular reasoning (Massman, 2002) (Aubinet, 2012) (Rosón, 2003) (Giering, 2014) (Smith, 2001) (Lundberg, 1996) (Peltoniemi, 2006) (Ito, 2005) (Haverd, 2013) (Shvidenko, 1996) (Dufrêne, 2005). Net flows and flow information derived from climate models are a form of circular reasoning if they subsume AGW theory in the process of providing empirical evidence for for that theory (Munshi, 2016) (Rodhe, 2000) (Edwards, 1999) and in particular if uncertainty is not given due consideration but used to facilitate convenient assumptions (Munshi, 2015a).

DATA AND METHODS: Weekly mean insitu atmospheric CO2 concentrations in parts per million measured at the Mauna Loa Observatory 1958-2016 are provided by the Scripps CO2 Program of UC San Diego (Scripps CO2 Program, 2017). Discrete flask measurements of atmospheric CO2 from 104 stations around the world are provided by the Earth System Research Laboratory of the NOAA for various sample periods within the range of 1967-2015 (ESRL, 2017). Twenty three of these stations are selected for this study using a criterion of at least 20 years of data availability. The selected stations, listed in Figure 2, provide a wide geographical distribution. They include Mauna Loa as well as stations in the South Pole, Australia, Canada, Alaska, the lower 48 states of the USA, the South Pacific, China, Central Asia, Europe, and Russia and provide more than 102,500 discrete flask atmospheric CO2 measurements for the period 1967-2015. Figure 1 shows that data availability is sparse prior to 1981 in the ESRL dataset and that atmospheric CO2 rose from about 320 ppm in 1967 to more than 400 ppm in 2015. Data availability is more uniform in the Scripps insitu weekly mean data and they also show rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere from less than 320 ppm in 1958 to more than 400 ppm in 2016. Because of the difference in data availability between the early years and later years in the ESRL data, and also because it is helpful to test the robustness of results with respect to sample period, both datasets are studied for different time spans. The full span of the data for both datasets and the period 1981 to 2015, a period with good data availability that is common to both datasets, are studied. An annual time scale is used as is usual in the study of the impact of emissions on atmospheric CO2 (Bousquet, 2000) (Canadell, 2007) (Gillett, 2013). For the NOAA/ESRL data, a single amalgamated time series of all 102,517 measurements from all twenty three stations is created and the mean and standard deviation of atmospheric CO2 for each year of data are derived and used in a Monte Carlo procedure to simulate the uncertainty in the data. Annual changes in atmospheric CO2 are computed as the corresponding difference in parts per million reported by the measuring stations multiplied by 2.12 to convert ppm to gigatons of carbon equivalent (GTC). Data for fossil fuel emissions in millions of tons of carbon equivalent are provided by the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center of the Oak Ridge National Laboratories (CDIAC, 2017). Data are available from 1750 to 2013 provided as megatons of carbon equivalent per year. These values are divided by 1000 and reported in this work as gigatons of carbon equivalent per year (GTC). Emissions for later years are inferred from percentage changes reported by other sources (CarbonBrief, 2016) (The Conversation, 2016) (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2016). Correlation between annual changes in atmospheric CO2 and the corresponding fossil fuel emissions are computed both in the source time series and in the detrended series. Uncertainty in the data causes the computed correlations to be somewhat different from one simulation to the next. Ten consecutive simulations are used as a representative sample of the correlation. The standard deviation of correlation is estimated using Bowley’s procedure (Bowley, 1928). Correlation in the source time series can be spurious because it contains both the time scale effect being investigated and an effect of a common drift in time in the two series. For this reason both time series must be detrended to isolate the effect at any given time scale (Podobnik, 2008) (Hu, 2001) (Munshi, 2016). Both source data correlation and detrended correlation are reported and tested for statistical significance. There are three combinations of source and detrended correlations, viz, (1) the source data are correlated and the correlation survives into the detrended series, (2) the source data are correlated but the correlation does not survive into the detrended series, and (3) the source data are not correlated. Only case (1) provides evidence of correlation at the time scale being studied. Case (2) indicates that the correlation in the source data derive mostly from a shared long term drift in time and not at the time scale being studied. Because a positive correlation is necessary to establish the causal relationship between changes in atmospheric CO2 and fossil fuel emissions described in the IPCC carbon budget, statistical significance is established with the one tailed hypothesis test H0: ρ≤0 against HA: ρ>0. Here ρ represents the correlation in the underlying phenomenon that generated the sample data being studied. The maximum false positive error rate is set to α=0.001, much lower than the usual values of α=0.01 to α=05, in accordance with Revised Standards for Statistical Significance (Johnson, 2013) published by the NAS to address an unacceptable rate of irreproducible results in published research (Siegfried, 2010). Since ten comparisons are made for the ten different simulation results for each correlation tested, the probability of finding at least one significant correlation in random data is increased by a factor of ten (Holm, 1979). The maximum false positive error rate is maintained by the requiring multiple rejections of H0 in any given set of ten comparisons rather than applying the so called Bonferroni Adjustment (Armstrong, 2014) (Moran, 2003) (Garamszegi, 2006). For the annual time scale, emissions is set to EJ for the Jth year and atmospheric accumulation is computed as 2.12*(CJ-CJ-1). Here EJ is fossil fuel and cement emissions in gigatons of carbon equivalent in the Jth year and CJ is average atmospheric CO2 concentration for the Jth year denoted in parts per million.
This work represents an update and further study of the relationship between fossil fuel (and cement production) emissions and atmospheric accumulation of carbon dioxide presented in prior studies (Munshi, Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Anthropogenic Emissions: A Note , 2015) (Munshi, Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Fossil Fuel Emissions: Part 2, 2016) (Munshi, Some Methodological Issues in Climate Science, 2016). All data and computational details used in this study are available in an online data archive (Munshi, 2017 Atmospheric CO2 paper Data Archive, 2017).

THE DATA

bandicam 2020-06-14 20-31-07-498

bandicam 2020-06-14 20-34-55-522

For the NOAA/ESRL data, a single amalgamated time series of all 102,517 measurements from all twenty three stations is created and the mean and standard deviation of atmospheric CO2 for each year of data are derived and used in a Monte Carlo procedure to simulate the uncertainty in the data. Annual changes in atmospheric CO2 are computed as the corresponding difference in parts per million reported by the measuring stations multiplied by 2.12 to convert ppm to gigatons of carbon equivalent (GTC).

Data for fossil fuel emissions in millions of tons of carbon equivalent are provided by the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center of the Oak Ridge National Laboratories (CDIAC, 2017). Data are available from 1750 to 2013 provided as megatons of carbon equivalent per year. These values are divided by 1000 and reported in this work as gigatons of carbon equivalent per year (GTC). Emissions for later years are inferred from percentage changes reported by other sources (CarbonBrief, 2016) (The Conversation, 2016) (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2016).

Correlation between annual changes in atmospheric CO2 and the corresponding fossil fuel emissions are computed both in the source time series and in the detrended series. Uncertainty in the data causes the computed correlations to be somewhat different from one simulation to the next. Ten consecutive simulations are used as a representative sample of the correlation. The standard deviation of correlation is estimated using Bowley’s procedure (Bowley, 1928). Correlation in the source time series can be spurious because it contains both the time scale effect being investigated and an effect of a common drift in time in the two series. For this reason both time series must be detrended to isolate the effect at any given time scale (Podobnik, 2008) (Hu, 2001) (Munshi, 2016). Both source data correlation and detrended correlation are reported and tested for statistical significance.

There are three combinations of source and detrended correlations, viz, (1) the source data are correlated and the correlation survives into the detrended series, (2) the source data are correlated but the correlation does not survive into the detrended series, and (3) the source data are not correlated. Only case (1) provides evidence of correlation at the time scale being studied. Case (2) indicates that the correlation in the source data derive mostly from a shared long term drift in time and not at the time scale being studied.
Because a positive correlation is necessary to establish the causal relationship between changes in atmospheric CO2 and fossil fuel emissions described in the IPCC carbon budget, statistical significance is established with the one tailed hypothesis test H0: ρ≤0 against HA: ρ>0. Here ρ represents the correlation in the underlying phenomenon that generated the sample data being studied. The maximum false positive error rate is set to α=0.001, much lower than the usual values of α=0.01 to α=05, in accordance with Revised Standards for Statistical Significance (Johnson, 2013) published by the NAS to address an unacceptable rate of irreproducible results in published research (Siegfried, 2010). Since ten comparisons are made for the ten different simulation results for each correlation tested, the probability of finding at least one significant correlation in random data is increased by a factor of ten (Holm, 1979). The maximum false positive error rate is maintained by the requiring multiple rejections of H0 in any given set of ten comparisons rather than applying the so called Bonferroni Adjustment (Armstrong, 2014) (Moran, 2003) (Garamszegi, 2006).

For the annual time scale, emissions is set to EJ for the Jth year and atmospheric accumulation is computed as 2.12*(CJ-CJ-1). Here EJ is fossil fuel and cement emissions in gigatons of carbon equivalent in the Jth year and CJ is average atmospheric CO2 concentration for the Jth year denoted in parts per million. This work represents an update and further study of the relationship between fossil fuel (and cement production) emissions and atmospheric accumulation of carbon dioxide presented in prior studies (Munshi, Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Anthropogenic Emissions: A Note , 2015) (Munshi, Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Fossil Fuel Emissions: Part 2, 2016) (Munshi, Some Methodological Issues in Climate Science, 2016). All data and computational details used in this study are available in an online data archive (Munshi, 2017 Atmospheric CO2 paper Data Archive, 2017).

DATA ANALYSIS:Annual means of the weekly mean insitu atmospheric CO2 data provided by Scripps are tabulated in Figure 3 below. The listed variables are MEAN = annual mean of the reported atmospheric carbon dioxide values, STDEV = their standard deviation, N = number of values reported that year, SE = the standard error of the mean, SIM-MEAN = Monte Carlo simulation of the mean that captures uncertainty implied by the standard error, EMISSIONS = fossil fuel and cement carbon dioxide emissions reported as gigatons of carbon equivalent per year (GTC), SIM-INCREASE = annual accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere computed from the SIM-MEAN column as this year’s CO2 level minus previous year’s CO2 level and converted to GTC, DETEMIS = detrended emissions, and DETINCR = detrended annual CO2 accumulation. Values in the two SIM columns will be different for each simulation. Ten different Monte Carlo simulations are used and the correlation between SIM-INCR and EMISSIONS and that between DETINCR and DETEMIS are computed for each simulation and tested for statistical significance at α=0.001 per comparison.

DATA ANALYSIS; Results for time span = 1958-2016 and time scale =1 year are tabulated in Figure 4 below where CORR refers to the correlation between the source data (SIM-INCREASE and EMISSIONS) and DETCORR to the detrended correlation between DETINCR and DETEMIS. The eleven rows in the Table represent eleven different simulations. The CORR columns in Figure 4 show strong statistically significant correlations for the source data in all eleven simulations. The simulations capture the uncertainty in annual mean CO2 accumulation. The null hypothesis H0: ρ≤0 is rejected in all eleven simulations. At the same time the DETCORR columns show a complete failure to reject H0 for detrended correlations. A graphical representation of these results appears in Figure 5. The combination of a correlation in the source data and absence of correlation at a given time scale in the detrended series indicates that the correlation in the source data derives from a shared long term drift in time and not from a relationship between their annual fluctuations net of long term trend. These results show that the data do not provide evidence that EMISSIONS and SIM-INCREASE are related at an annual time scale. This result is consistent with the findings in prior works (Munshi, 2015) and inconsistent with the IPCC carbon budget and the AGW hypothesis which assume that observed increases in atmospheric CO2 derive from fossil fuel emissions (Le Quéré, 2009) (Canadell, 2007) (Solomon, 2009) (Hansen, 1981) (IPCC, 2000) (IPCC, 2014).

FIGURE 3: THE DATA  bandicam 2020-06-15 09-20-42-805

bandicam 2020-06-15 09-21-48-819

FIGURE 4: DETRENDED CORRELATION ANALYSIS 

bandicam 2020-06-15 09-33-54-699

FIGURE 5: GRAPHICAL DISPLAY OF CORRELATION ANALYSIS

bandicam 2020-06-15 09-42-26-940

bandicam 2020-06-15 09-43-13-244

TIME SPANS: We now look at the same data for two additional time spans for ease of comparison with the dataset of global flask CO2 measurements. Figures 6&7 summarize the results for the time span 1967-2015 and Figures 8&9 show results for the span 1981-2015. The time scale is annual in both cases. The time for emissions to become well mixed in the atmosphere is thought to be one year (Bousquet, 2000). For the span 1967-2015 (Figures 6&7), strong evidence of correlation is found in the source data but no correlation can be detected in the detrended series. As we did for the full span 1958-2015, we conclude that correlation in the source data derives from long term trends and not from correspondence in year to year fluctuations. Somewhat different results are seen for the span 1981-2015 (Figures 8&9). No statistically significant correlation is found in the detrended series or in the source data. These data fail to provide evidence in support of climate science assumptions that relate changes in atmospheric CO2 to fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale.

FIGURES 6&7bandicam 2020-06-15 12-12-41-202

bandicam 2020-06-15 12-14-17-541

bandicam 2020-06-15 12-15-01-326

FIGURES 8&9

bandicam 2020-06-15 12-44-17-723

bandicam 2020-06-15 12-45-29-724

bandicam 2020-06-15 12-46-17-654

FIGURE 10

bandicam 2020-06-15 12-53-05-069bandicam 2020-06-15 12-53-54-954

FIGURE 11 & FIGURE 12: GLOBAL FLASK DATA 1967-2015

bandicam 2020-06-15 14-46-42-626

bandicam 2020-06-15 14-47-31-888bandicam 2020-06-15 14-48-13-987

FIGURE 13 & FIGURE 14: GLOBAL FLASK DATA 1981-2015

bandicam 2020-06-15 16-39-08-739bandicam 2020-06-15 16-39-43-638bandicam 2020-06-15 16-40-17-187

FINDINGS: The results of detrended correlation analysis of global flask CO2 measurements for the full span of the data 1967-2015 are summarized in Figures 11&12. As in Figures 8&9, we find that although the correlation in the source data appears to be higher than that in the detrended series, no statistically significant correlation is found in either series at the maximum false positive error rate of α=0.001 per comparison used in this study. However, for the shorter time span of 1981-2015 (Figures 13&14) where data availability is more uniform across the study period (Figure 1), the source data correlations are much higher and here we see the results similar to those depicted in Figures 4&5 (Mauna Loa 1958-2016) and Figures 6&7 (Mauna Loa 1967-2015) with a strong correlations in the source data that goes away when the data are detrended. In all of the above cases, the absence of correlation in the detrended series fails to provide empirical support for the usual carbon budget hypothesis that emissions drive changes in atmospheric CO2. In cases where the a correlation is found in the source data, its absence in the detrended series indicates that the source data correlation derives from a shared drift in time and not from shared fluctuations at the specified time scale that is prerequisite to a causation hypothesis (Podobnik, 2008) (Chatfield, 1989). These results are consistent with findings in prior works that also found no empirical evidence that changes in atmospheric CO2 are driven by fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale (Munshi, 2015) (Munshi, 2016). All data and computational details are available in a data archive (Munshi, 2017).

CONCLUSIONS: A key relationship in the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is that between annual fossil fuel emissions and annual changes in atmospheric CO2. The proposed causation sequence is that annual fossil fuel emissions cause annual changes in atmospheric CO2 which in turn intensifies the atmosphere’s heat trapping property. It is concluded that global warming is due to changes in atmospheric composition attributed to human activity and is therefore a human creation and that therefore we must reduce or eliminate fossil fuel emissions to avoid climate catastrophe (Parmesan, 2003) (Stern, 2007) (IPCC, 2014) (Flannery, 2006) (Allen, 2009) (Gillett, 2013) (Meinshausen, 2009) (Canadell, 2007) (Solomon, 2009) (Stocker, 2013) (Rogelj, 2016). A testable implication of the proposed causation sequence is that annual changes in atmospheric CO2 must be related to annual fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale. This work is a test of this hypothesis.

We find that detrended correlation analysis of annual emissions and annual changes in atmospheric CO2 does not support the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis because no evidence is found that changes in atmospheric CO2 are related to fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale.

These results are consistent with prior works that found no evidence to relate the rate of warming to the rate of emissions (Munshi, The Correlation between Emissions and Warming in the CET, 2017) (Munshi, Long Term Temperature Trends in Daily Station Data: Australia, 2017) (Munshi, Generational Fossil Fuel Emissions and Generational Warming: A Note, 2016) (Munshi, Decadal Fossil Fuel Emissions and Decadal Warming: A Note, 2015) (Munshi, Effective Sample Size of the Cumulative Values of a Time Series, 2016) (Munshi, The Spuriousness of Correlations between Cumulative Values, 2016). The finding raises important questions about the validity of the IPCC carbon budget which apparently overcomes a great uncertainty in much larger natural flows to describe with great precision how flows of annual emissions are distributed to gains in atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide (Bopp, 2002) (Chen, 2000) (Davis, 2010) (IPCC, 2014) (McGuire, 2001). These carbon budget conclusions are inconsistent with the findings of this study and are the likely result of insufficient attention to uncertainty, excessive reliance on climate models, and the use of “net flows” (Plattner, 2002) that are likely to be subject to assumptions and circular reasoning (Edwards, 1999) (Ito, 2005) (Munshi, 2015a) (Munshi, 2016) (Munshi, An Empirical Study of Fossil Fuel Emissions and Ocean Acidification, 2015).

REFERENCES: Achen, C. (1982). Interpreting and using regression. Vol. 29. Sage.
Ackerman, S. (2006). Meteorology: Understanding the Atmosphere. Jones and Barlett Titles in Physical Science.
Allen, M. (2009). Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature , 458.7242 (2009): 1163-1166.
Anselin, L. (1990). Some robust approaches to testing and estimation in spatial econometrics. Regional Science and Urban Economics , 20.2 (1990): 141-163.
Armstrong, R. (2014). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. When to use the Bonferroni correction , 34.5 (2014): 502-508.
Aubinet, M. (2012). Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
Bachelet, D. (2001). Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems , 4.3 (2001): 164-185.
Baltagi, B. (1985). Pooling cross-sections with unequal time-series lengths. Economics Letters , 18.2-3 (1985): 133-136.
Bengtsson, L. (2004). Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , 109.D11 (2004).
Bopp, L. (2002). Climate‐induced oceanic oxygen fluxes: Implications for the contemporary carbon budget.” Global Biogeochemical Cycles. Global Biogeochemical Cycles , 16.2 (2002).
Bousquet, P. (2000). Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980. Science , 290.5495 (2000): 1342-1346.
Bowley, A. (1928). The standard deviation of the correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 23.161 (1928): 31-34.
Box, G. (1994). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Callendar, G. (1938). The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , 64.275 (1938): 223-240.
Canadell, J. (2007). Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , 104.47 (2007): 18866-18870.
CarbonBrief. (2016). What global emissions in 2016 mean for climate change goals. Retrieved 2017, from Carbon Brief: https://www.carbonbrief.org/what-global-co2-emissions-2016-mean-climate-change
CDIAC. (2017). CDIAC. Retrieved 2017, from ORNL.GOV: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/meth_reg.html
CDIAC. (2014). Global Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Retrieved 2017, from CDIAC / ORNL: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_glob_2013.html
Chatfield, C. (1989). The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Chen, W. (2000). An integrated terrestrial ecosystem carbon-budget model based on changes in disturbance, climate, and atmospheric chemistry. Ecological Modelling , 135.1 (2000): 55-79.
Davis, S. (2010). Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science , 329.5997 (2010): 1330-1333.
Davison, M. (2016). Man made global warming. Retrieved 2017, from Ministry for the Environment. Government of New Zealand: http://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/NZETS_reviewstage2%20-%20Davison,%20Michael%2004035(b).pdf
Dufrêne, E. (2005). Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest: Part I: Model description and uncertainty analysis on modelled NEE. Ecological Modelling , 185.2 (2005): 407-436.
Easterling, D. (2009). Is the climate warming or cooling? Geophysical Research Letters , 36.8 (2009).
Edwards, P. (1999). Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data‐laden models, model‐filtered data. Science as Culture , 8.4 (1999): 437-472.
ESRL. (2017). NOAA/ESRL. Retrieved 2017, from NOAA/ESRL: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/data/index.php
Flannery, T. (2006). The weather makers: How man is changing the climate and what it means for life on earth. Grove Press, 2006.
Friedlingstein, P. (2006). Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. Journal of Climate , 19.14 (2006): 3337-3353.
Garamszegi, L. (2006). Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behavioral Ecology , 17.4 (2006): 682-687.
Giering, S. (2014). Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean/’s twilight zone. Nature , 507.7493 (2014): 480-483.
Gillett, N. (2013). Constraining the ratio of global warming to cumulative CO2 emissions using CMIP5 simulations. Journal of Climate , 26.18 (2013): 6844-6858.
Hansen, J. (1981). Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science , 213.4511 (1981): 957-966.
Hansen, J. (2016). Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 C global warming could be dangerous. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 16.6 (2016): 3761-3812.
Haverd, V. (2013). The Australian terrestrial carbon budget. Biogeosciences , 10.2 (2013).
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , 6:2:65-70.
Hu, K. (2001). Physical Review , E 64.1 (2001): 011114.
Hulme, M. (2010, November 16). The Year Climate Science Was Redefined. The Guardian .
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, 2014. Geneva: IPCC.
IPCC. (2000). Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES), a special report of Working Group III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ito, A. (2005). Climate-related uncertainties in projections of the twenty-first century terrestrial carbon budget: off-line model experiments using IPCC greenhouse-gas scenarios and AOGCM climate projections. Climate Dynamics , 24.5 (2005): 435-448.
JIR. (2017). Journal of Irreproducible Results. Retrieved 2017, from Journal of Irreproducible Results: http://www.jir.com/
Johnson, V. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Retrieved 2015, from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: http://www.pnas.org/content/110/48/19313.full
Kantelhardt, J. (2001). Detecting long-range correlations with detrended fluctuation analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 295.3 (2001): 441-454.
Lacis, A. (2010). Atmospheric CO2: Principal control knob governing Earth’s temperature. Science , 330.6002 (2010): 356-359.
Le Quéré, C. (2009). Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience , 2.12 (2009): 831-836.
Lundberg, L. (1996). A Nordic Seas–Arctic Ocean carbon budget from volume flows and inorganic carbon data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles , 10.3 (1996): 493-510.
Massman, W. (2002). Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 113.1 (2002): 121-144.
McGuire, A. (2001). Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles , 15.1 (2001): 183-206.
Meinshausen, M. (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature , 458.7242 (2009): 1158-1162.
Moran, M. (2003). Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos , 100.2 (2003): 403-405.
Munshi, J. (2017). 2017 Atmospheric CO2 paper Data Archive. Retrieved 2017, from Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByzA6UNa41ZfX1dhR1VxbmdaRGs
Munshi, J. (2015). An Empirical Study of Fossil Fuel Emissions and Ocean Acidification. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2669930.
Munshi, J. (2015). Decadal Fossil Fuel Emissions and Decadal Warming: A Note. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2662870.
Munshi, J. (2016). Effective Sample Size of the Cumulative Values of a Time Series. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2853163.
Munshi, J. (2016). Generational Fossil Fuel Emissions and Generational Warming: A Note. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2845972.
Munshi, J. (2017). Long Term Temperature Trends in Daily Station Data: Australia. Retrieved 2017, from SSRN.COM: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2968352
Munshi, J. (2015). Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Anthropogenic Emissions: A Note . Retrieved 2017, from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2642639 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2642639
Munshi, J. (2016). Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Fossil Fuel Emissions: Part 2. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2862438.
Munshi, J. (2016). Some Methodological Issues in Climate Science. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2873672.
Munshi, J. (2016). Spurious Correlations in Time Series Data. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827927.
Munshi, J. (2017). The Correlation between Emissions and Warming in the CET. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2956179.
Munshi, J. (2016). The Spuriousness of Correlations between Cumulative Values. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2725743.
Munshi, J. (2015a). Uncertain Flow Accounting and the IPCC Carbon Budget. SSRN , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2654191.
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. (2016). Trends in global CO2 emissions. Retrieved 2017, from European Commission Joint Research Centre: http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news_docs/jrc-2016-trends-in-global-co2-emissions-2016-report-103425.pdf
Parmesan, C. (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature , 421.6918 (2003): 37-42.
Peltoniemi, M. (2006). Factors affecting the uncertainty of sinks and stocks of carbon in Finnish forests soils and vegetation. Forest Ecology and Management , 232.1 (2006): 75-85.
Plattner, G. (2002). Revision of the global carbon budget due to changing air‐sea oxygen fluxes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles , 16.4 (2002).
Podobnik, B. (2008). Detrended cross-correlation analysis: a new method for analyzing two nonstationary time series. Physical review letters , 100.8 (2008): 084102.
Revelle, R. (1957). Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO2 during the past decades. Tellus , 9.1 (1957): 18-27.
Rodhe, H. (2000). Avoiding circular logic in climate modeling. Climatic Change , 44.4 (2000): 419-422.
Rogelj, J. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature , 534.7609 (2016): 631-639.
Rosón, G. (2003). Carbon distribution, fluxes, and budgets in the subtropical North Atlantic Ocean (24.5 N). Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , 108.C5 (2003).
Sarmiento, J. (1998). Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming. Nature , 393.6682 (1998): 245-249.
Scripps CO2 Program. (2017). Scripps CO2 Program. Retrieved 2017, from UCSD: http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/data/atmospheric_co2/
Shvidenko, A. (1996). Carbon budget of the Russian boreal forests: a systems analysis approach to uncertainty. In Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle (pp. 145-152). Berlin: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Siegfried, T. (2010). Odds Are, It’s Wrong. Retrieved 2016, from Science News: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/odds-are-its-wrong
Smith, J. (2001). Identifying influences on model uncertainty: an application using a forest carbon budget model. Environmental Management , 27.2 (2001): 253-267.
Solomon, S. (2009). Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , 106.6 (2009): 1704-1709.
Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Stocker, T. (2013). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5). New York (2013): IPCC.
The Conversation. (2016). Fossil fuel emissions have stalled. Retrieved 2017, from The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/fossil-fuel-emissions-have-stalled-global-carbon-budget-2016-68568

6 Responses to "RESPONSIVENESS OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 TO FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS"

The atmospheric CO2 mass balance is applicable for the whole period. Total emitted fossil fuel carbon from 1958 to 2015 is 336*10^12 kg C, corresponding to 156 ppm of CO2 increase in the atmosphere if nothing else happens (336*10^12 kg C ; molecular weight = 12 kg/kmole ; atmos weight = 5.2*10^18 kg ; 29 kg/kmole ==> 336/12/5.2*29*10^-6 = 156 ppm).

The measured atmospheric CO2 concentration has in the meantime increased, accumulated, from 315 ppm to 401 ppm = 86 ppm.

Total atmospheric CO2 mass balance for the period 1958 to 2015 is fulfilled as :

Inlets + Produced = Outlets + Accumulated

Inlets from nature (land and oceans) and from fossil fuels combusted = Nature_in + Anthrop_in

Produced = 0
(CH4 & CO concentration is ~0)

Outlets to nature = Nature_out

Accumulated = the measured change of the CO2 concentration

==>

Nature_out – Nature_in = Anthrop_in – Accumulated

With figures :

Nature_out – Nature_in = 156 – 86 = 70 ppm

All according to the atmospheric CO2 material balance, net 70 ppm has transferred from the atmosphere to the nature. Nature has been a net sink during the period.

Detrended data is not applicable for material balancing during the studied period.

Kind regards
Anders Rasmusson

chaamjamal
The argument from the warmists is that the “natural” emissions are matched by the “natural” sinks in a very noisy set of data and the human source provides the rising trend. As I understand it your work addresses the data sets and says there is no response in the atmospheric CO2 that coincides with the human emission data. I have always understood that finding as falsification proof. It occurred to me today to ask if a system could be designed that acted like the PCC supposes but your analysis would get the same results? In other words “Is there any way, even a mind game scenario, where a “put in-take out”that is balanced over time can have another source introduced that causes a trend but cannot be identified in your analysis?
Thanks

All we have to go on is the data and the data is what the data is, our yearning notwithstanding.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: