Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice?
Posted August 4, 2018
on:
RELATED POST: ANTARCTIC SEA ICE 1979-2018
RELATED POST: GEOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE ARCTIC
RELATED POST: ARCTIC SEA ICE BIBLIOGRAPHY
RELATED POST: TIDAL CYCLES BIBLIOGRAPHY
ABSTRACT: Satellite radiometry and visual imagery of Arctic sea ice since 1979 have allowed us to track its dramatic seasonal cycle in which 70% of the March maximum sea ice area is gone by September. This extreme seasonal cycle is taken to imply that Arctic sea ice area is sensitive to ambient temperature. The satellite data also show a long term year to year decline in Arctic sea ice in every season concurrent with global warming. This concurrence has led to the assumption that the observed long term decline in sea ice is a response to global warming. This study is a test of that hypothesis. Arctic sea ice data for each calendar month are tested for the responsiveness of sea ice area to global warming at annual and five-year time scales using detrended correlation analysis. Satellite measurements of lower troposphere temperature over the north polar region are used as the relevant measure of global warming. It is found that of the twelve calendar months only two contain both statistically significant sea ice loss and statistically significant correlation of the rate of sea ice loss with global warming. These results do not constitute convincing evidence of correlation required to support the assumption that sea ice decline is driven by global warming.
It is likely that the observed loss in sea ice area is a more complex phenomenon possibly with roles for winds, ocean currents, geothermal heat, and natural multi-decadal variability of lunar nodal cycles and other ocean characteristics not measured and not fully understood. Global warming may play a role in what may be a complex multivariate phenomenon but the data do not show that global warming drives year to year changes in Arctic sea ice area or that the decline can be halted or moderated by taking climate action.
A map of undersea geological activity in the Arctic shown below was provided by geologist James Edward Kamis in a blog about the Arctic Ocean [LINK] . In the map, red triangles with black outline are locations of active submarine volcanoes and areas marked with red cross hatching indicate mantle plumes (rocks being pushed out of the earth’s mantle that often melt when they reach lower pressure areas). These geological features imply that geothermal activity is extensive in the Arctic and that they may well play a role in sea ice dynamics. These effects are not considered in the standard climate change interpretation of changes in Arctic sea ice.
- Arctic sea ice area undergoes an intense seasonal cycle reaching a winter maximum extent of 13 million square kilometers (MSK) in March and a summer minimum of 4 MSK in September on average in the study period 1979-2017/8. The seasonal cycle in sea ice area is synchronized with the seasonal cycle in air temperature in an almost perfect inverse relationship. This correlation is generally accepted as sufficient evidence that sea ice is responsive to air temperature – melting in the warmth of summer and freezing in the cold of winter (Serreze, 2011). The observed seasonal relationship is the basis for the assumption that the observed decline in Arctic sea ice area since satellite measurements began in 1979 is attributable to anthropogenic global warming (AGW), and that it could accelerate AGW due to a loss of albedo if the Arctic becomes ice free (Perovich, 2007) for a number of summer months (Cavalieri, 2012) (Comiso, 2002) (Comiso, 2008) (IPCC, 2014) (Parkinson, 2002) (Serreze, 2007) (Winton, 2006). These concerns have specific application in the September minimum sea ice area in the Arctic where the lowest extents observed have occurred in the most recent decade (Liu, 2013) (Overpeck, 2005) (Winton, 2006).
- This study is a statistical test of the hypothesis that global warming explains changes in Arctic sea ice area at annual or 5-year time scales. It was carried out as soon as the July 2018 data for Arctic sea ice area and satellite based measurements of lower tropospheric temperature in the North Polar region became available. Both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice areas are studied. The annual time series of mean monthly sea ice area are studied for each calendar month separately. Unusually low September minimum sea ice area in the Arctic in 2007, 2012, and 2016 created a great interest in the study of sea ice (NSIDC, 2016) (NASA, 2016) (Vidal, 2016). The year 2016 is also considered notable for its low sea ice area in the winter maximum month of March (NASA, 2016) and it re-kindled the alarming prospect of an ice-free Arctic in summer both as a sign of dangerous climate change and also as a positive feedback that could accelerate climate change (Liu, 2013) (Overpeck, 2005) (Winton, 2006) (Wang-Overland, 2009) (Wang-Overland, 2012) (Wang-Overland, 2013). In this work, we find a statistically significant decline in sea ice area in the Arctic for the calendar months of June to October with the rate of decline lowest in June and graducally rising to the highest in October. No statistically significant trend in Arctic sea ice area is found for the other calendar months. The relationship between global warming and sea ice area at annual and 5-year time scales for each of the twelve calendar months is studied with detrended correlation analysis. Of the months with a statistically significant full span OLS sea ice loss, only June and October show statistically significant detrended correlations with global warming at these time scales. It is noteworthy that neither of the seasonal extremum months of March and September shows a statistically significant detrended correlation between global warming and sea ice area.
- Since the Little Ice Age ended in the mid-19th century, there has been a strong and steady warming trend (Overpeck, 1997) that is generally assumed to be human-caused by way of fossil fuel emissions that is thought to cause atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration to rise with that in turn causing warming by way of a “greenhouse gas effect” of these changes in atmospheric composition (Callendar, 1938) (Revelle, 1983) (Keeling, 1977) (Hansen, 1981) (Lacis, 2010). With regard to the adverse and possibly dangerous effects of human-caused global warming and climate change, a great deal of attention has been given to the changes observed in the Arctic Ocean. The reason for the focus on the Arctic and particularly Arctic sea ice, is three-fold. First the Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world with a steep and alarming rate of loss in September’s seasonal minimum sea ice area from year to year. Secondly, the loss of Arctic sea ice is also a loss of ice albedo which suggests a positive feedback loop with catastrophic runaway global warming. Thirdly, the effect of Arctic warming on the jet stream may imply more harmful impacts of climate change than otherwise possible.
- Sea ice consists of free floating floes in constant motion driven by wind and ocean currents. Sea ice area is defined as a contiguous surface area of the sea, measured in millions of square kilometers (MSK), where at least 15% of the sea surface consists of floating ice. On average, the dispersion of sea ice within a sea ice area varies from 50% to 80% (Munshi, Trends in polar sea ice area, 2015). Both sea ice area and the degree of dispersion within the extent can be estimated in the brightness data of passive microwave images taken from satellite mounted instruments (Comiso, 1997). Sea ice area corrected for the degree of dispersion is reported as sea ice Area (NSIDC, 2016).
- An intense interest in polar sea ice area in the climate change era derives from the proposition that the multi-year decline in sea ice Area serves as measure of the impact of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) (Lacis, 2010) (Hansen, 1981) (IPCC, 2014) (Comiso, 2002). An additional consideration is the reduction in albedo due to lost polar sea ice could accelerate AGW and further complicate its effects on the climate system (Comiso, 2008) (Winton, 2006) (Perovich, 2007) (Serreze, 2007).
- Sea ice Area undergoes a deep seasonal cycle in both poles. In the Arctic, it reaches a summer minimum of ≈4 MSK or less in September rising to a winter peak of ≈12 MSK in March in the average seasonal cycle. The seasonal cycle is reversed in the Antarctic where the summer minimum is reached in February (2 MSK) with a winter maximum of in September (14.5 MSK). The amplitude of these seasonal changes is much greater than the differences implied by long term declining trends. (Parkinson, 2002) (Cavalieri, 2012) (Munshi, Trends in polar sea ice area, 2015). Because of these large seasonal changes, trend analyses of sea ice area are usually restricted to the summer minimum and winter maximum months. The study of the other calendar months, when undertaken, must be carried out one month at a time so that long term trends are not confounded by the relatively stronger seasonal changes.
- The generally assumed link between global warming and Arctic sea ice area subsumes a causal relationship in which global warming causes declining sea ice. The observed decline in sea ice area and the observed rise in surface temperature are assumed to be causally related so that the interpretation of these changes proceeds in terms of what appears to be obvious dynamics in which warming causes loss of Arctic sea ice. This relationship seems obvious in particular because the very high rate of warming in the Arctic region compared with other global regions (Munshi, Arctic Sea Ice Bibiliography, 2018). Yet, it is well known that correlation among time series data are often spurious because the effect of long term trends may be falsely interpreted as a responsiveness at the time scale of interest (Prodobnik, 2008) (Munshi, Spurious Correlations in Climate Science, 2018).
- Satellite radiometry and visual imagery for polar ice area are provided as monthly mean values by the National Snow and Ice Data Center of the USA (NSIDC, 2016). These data are available both in dispersed (Extent) and in concentrated (Area) form in millions of square kilometers (MSK). Here, only the (Area) measures of sea ice area is used because the dispersed extent is confounded by the degree of dispersion. The primary surface temperature data used in this study are the monthly mean temperature anomalies above ocean surfaces in the North Polar Oceans within 60N to 82.5N. The data are lower troposphere temperatures (LTT) measured with satellite mounted instruments. They are provided as monthly mean anomalies from January 1979 to July 2018 by the University of Alabama Huntsville (Christy/Spencer, 2018).
- Trend analysis is carried out separately for each calendar month. The testable implication of the theory that the declines in sea ice area can be attributed to warming is a negative correlation between monthly mean temperature and monthly mean sea ice area for each month on a year to year basis at the annual time scale. A 5-year time scale is also tested. Hypothesis tests for these correlations are set up with the null hypothesis H0: ρ≥0 against HA: ρ<0. This form of the hypothesis test derives from a theory that implies a negative correlation. Each comparison is made at a maximum false positive error rate of α=0.001 in accordance with “Revised standards for statistical evidence” published by the National Academy of Sciences to address an unacceptable rate of irreproducible results in published research (Johnson, 2013) (Siegfried, 2010). The effect of multiple comparisons on the overall study-wide maximum false positive error rate is estimated using Holm’s procedure (Holm, 1979).
- Data for Arctic Sea Ice area in millions of square kilometers is provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center of the Federal Government of the USA as both daily and monthly means from 1979 onwards (NSIDC, 2018). These data are taken by polar orbiting satellites that began measurements in December 1978 using radiometry as well as imagery in the visible spectrum. These measurements are considered to be the most reliable estimates of sea ice area possible as of this writing. The NSIDC reports sea ice area as EXTENT and also as AREA. The EXTENT measure, previously known as “dispersed extent”, reports the total area of the Arctic where at least 15% of the sea surface is occupied by sea ice. The AREA measure, previously known as “concentrated extent”, is the net ice area of the extent with areas of visible sea water removed from the extent measure. Only the AREA measure is used in this study because the EXTENT measure is confounded by the intervening variable having to do with the degree of dispersion that is of no interest in terms of the research question.
- Figure 7 is a tabulation of full span trends in sea ice area and temperature anomalies for each calendar month along with tests for statistical significance. The tests for significance are carried out at α=0.001. They show that the observed sea ice declines are statistically significant in the five summer and fall months of June to October. The declines observed in the data for the other calendar months can’t be interpreted as phenomena that require a cause and effect explanation because the observed trend could have been generated by randomness. The warming trends appear to be clearer but with the exception of July. Generally, the rate of warming is greater in winter and spring than in summer. However, the greatest rate of sea ice decline is seen in summer and fall with much more gradual sea ice declines in winter and spring. Only the five summer and autumn months of June to October contain statistically significant declines in sea ice area.
- Figure 8 is a tabulation of the results of detrended correlation analysis that addresses the research question of whether changes in sea ice area in each calendar month are responsive to the global warming temperature trend for that calendar month. The test is carried out at two time scales – annual and 5-year. At the annual time scale there is only one hypothesis and that is whether sea ice area is responsive to temperature at an annual time scale. This portion of the study is simply an update of a previous work with more recent data (Munshi, Responsiveness of sea ice extent to warming, 2016). At the 5-year time scale, three different hypotheses are tested. They are (1) whether the 5-year moving average sea ice area is responsive to the 5-year moving average temperature, (2) whether the 5-year rate of decline in sea ice is responsive to the 5-year moving average temperature, and (3) whether the 5-year decline in sea ice is responsive to the 5-year rate of warming.
- The results of detrended correlation analysis tabulated in Figure 8 show that four statistically significant correlations are found at an annual time-scale. They are the winter months of January and February, June in summer and October in autumn. Of these months only June and October show a statistically significant decline in sea ice (Figure 7). As a way of comparison, the 2016 study had also found four statistically significant correlations at an annual time scale but they were for the months of February, April, June, and July (Munshi, Responsiveness of sea ice extent to warming, 2016). The expectation was that a greater number of significant results would be found at the 5-year time scale but exactly four significant results were found with the months of January, February, and October in common with the annual time scale and with the addition of the month of December not found in the annual time scale. Of these months only the month of October shows a statistically significant declining trend in sea ice (Figure 7).
- Curiously, of the five months (June to October) with statistically significant declines in sea ice area (Figure 7), only one (October) shows a correlation with global warming at the five-year time scale whereas there were two at the one-year time scale. Thus, of the twelve calendar months studied only two months are found that contain both statistically significant losses in sea ice and statistically significant correlation of the rate of sea ice loss with the relevant measure of global warming. These results do not constitute convincing evidence of the correlation required to support the assumption that sea ice decline is driven by global warming.
- It is likely that the observed loss in sea ice area is a more complex phenomenon possibly with a role for winds, ocean currents, geothermal heat, and natural multidecadal variability of ocean characteristics not measured and not fully understood. Global warming may play a role in what may be a complex multivariate phenomenon but the data do not show that global warming drives year to year changes in Arctic sea ice area. More importantly, the results do not imply that the observed decline in Arctic sea ice area can be halted or moderated by taking climate action.
- The geological features of the Arctic that may play a role in sea ice extent variation are described in a related post [LINK] .
- CITATIONS PART 1: Bowley, A. (1928). The standard deviation of the correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 23.161 (1928): 31-34.
Box, G. (1994). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: : Prentice Hall.
Brewton, B. (1930). THE NATURE OF SUPERSTITION. The Ohio Sociologist, 3.3 (1930): 6-12.
Callendar, G. (1938). The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 64.275 (1938): 223-240.
Christy, J. (2007). Tropospheric temperature change since 1979 from tropical radiosonde and satellite measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , 112.D6 (2007).
Christy/Spencer. (2018). UAH-CDC MSU dataset v6. . Retrieved from UAH: http://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0.tx
Draper&Smith. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis. . Wiley.
Halsey, L. (2015). The fickle P value generates irreproducible results. Nature methods, 12.3 (2015): 179.
Hansen, J. (1981). Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213.4511 (1981): 957-966.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6:2:65-70.
Johnson, V. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110.48 (2013): 19313-19317.
Keeling, C. (1977). Impact of Industrial Gases on Climate. National Academy of Sciences, Geophysics Research Board,, 72-95. Washington.
Lacis, A. (2010). Atmospheric CO2: Principal control knob governing Earth’s temperature. Science, 330.6002 (2010): 356-359.
Matthews/Briffa. (2005). Little Ice Age’: re‐evaluation of an evolving concept. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 87.1 (2005): 17-36.
Munshi, J. (2015). A General Linear Model for Sea Ice Extent. SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2613333.
Munshi, J. (2015). Trends in Polar Sea Ice Extent 1979-2015. SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2598152.
Munshi, J. (2016). Responsiveness of sea ice extent to warming. SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2869646.
Munshi, J. (2016). Trend Profiles of Atmospheric Temperature Time Series. SSRN: , https://ssrn.com/abstract=2839119.
Munshi, J. (2017). Trends in UAH Zonal Mean Lower Troposphere Temperature. SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2985439.
Munshi, J. (2018). Arctic Sea Ice Archive. Retrieved from Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d8lDAaJASQt63v-qoT5GEDhsX0xlWrSB
Munshi, J. (2018). Arctic Sea Ice Bibiliography. Retrieved from Chaamjamal: https://chaamjamal.wordpress.com/2018/07/24/global-warming-and-arctic-sea-ice/
Munshi, J. (2018). Spurious Correlations in Climate Science. Retrieved from chaamjamal.wordpress.com: https://chaamjamal.wordpress.com/2018/05/27/spurious-correlations-in-climate-science-2/
NSIDC. (2018). NSIDC DATA. Retrieved from National Snow and Ice Data Center: http://nsidc.org/data/
Overpeck, J. (1997). Arctic environmental change of the last four centuries. science, 278.5341 (1997): 1251-1256.
Prinz, F. (2011). Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature reviews Drug discovery, 10.9 (2011): 712.
Prodobnik. (2008). Detrended cross correlation analysis. Physical Review Letters, 100: 084102.
Revelle, R. (1983). “Probable future changes in sea level resulting from increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Changing climate (NAS), 433-448.
Shumway, R. (2011). Time series analysis. . NY: Springer .
VonStorch, H. (1999). Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research. Berlin: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999. 11-26. - CITATIONS PART 2: Cavalieri, D. (2012). Antarctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2010. The Cryosphere, 6.4 (2012): 871-880.
Chatfield, C. (1989). The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Comiso, J. (1997). Passive microwave algorithms for sea ice concentration: A comparison of two techniques. Remote sensing of Environment, 60.3 (1997): 357-384.
Comiso, J. (2002). A rapidly declining perennial sea ice cover in the Arctic. Geophysical Research Letters, 29.20 (2002).
Comiso, J. (2008). Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophysical research letters, 35.1 (2008).
Francis, J. (2005). Clues to variability in Arctic minimum sea ice area. Geophysical Research Letters, 32.21 (2005).
Gordon, C. (2000). The simulation of SST, sea ice areas and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate dynamics , 16.2-3 (2000): 147-168.
Hadley Centre. (2016). Met Office Hadley Centre observations datasets. Retrieved 2016, from metoffice.gov.uk: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/
Hansen, J. (1981). Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Science, 213: 957-66.
Holland, P. (2012). Wind-driven trends in Antarctic sea-ice drift. Nature Geoscience, 5.12 (2012): 872-875.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6:2:65-70.
IPCC. (2007). AR4 WG1 Chapter 7: Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. Geneva: IPCC.
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2013 The Physical Science Basis. Geneva: IPCC/UNEP.
Johnson, V. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Retrieved 2015, from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: http://www.pnas.org/content/110/48/19313.full
RESPONSIVENESS OF POLAR SEA ICE AREA TO AIR TEMPERATURE 1979-2016, JAMAL MUNSHI, 2016 17
Kay, J. (2008). The contribution of cloud and radiation anomalies to the 2007 Arctic sea ice area minimum. Geophysical Research Letters, 35.8 (2008).
Lacis, A. (2010). Principal Control Knob Governing Earth’s Temperature. Science, 330.
Liu, J. (2013). Reducing spread in climate model projections of a September ice-free Arctic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110.31 (2013): 12571-12576.
Munshi, J. (2015). A General Linear Model for Sea Ice area. Retrieved 2016, from ssrn.com: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2613333
Munshi, J. (2015). Trends in polar sea ice area. Retrieved 2016, from ssrn.com: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2598152
Munshi, J. (2016). Sea Ice 2016 Data Archive. Retrieved 2016, from Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByzA6UNa41ZfMnFic2YycVlYelE
Munshi, J. (2016). Spurious Correlations in Time Series Data. Retrieved 2016, from ssrn.com: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2827927
NASA. (2016). 2016 Arctic Sea Ice Wintertime Extent Hits Another Record Low. Retrieved 2016, from NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/2016-arctic-sea-ice-wintertime-extent-hits-another-record-low
NASA. (2016). Arctic Sea Ice Annual Minimum Ties Second Lowest on Record. Retrieved 2016, from NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/arctic-sea-ice-annual-minimum-ties-second-lowest-on-record
Nicol, S. (2000). Ocean circulation off east Antarctica affects ecosystem structure and sea-ice area. Nature, 406.6795 (2000): 504-507.
NOAA. (2016). USCRN. Retrieved 2016, from NOAA: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/us-climate-reference-network-uscrn
NSIDC. (2016). 2016 ties with 2007 for second lowest Arctic sea ice minimum. Retrieved 2016, from NSIDC: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2016/09/2016-ties-with-2007-for-second-lowest-arctic-sea-ice-minimum/
NSIDC. (2016). NSIDC DATA. Retrieved 2016, from NSIDC.ORG: http://nsidc.org/data/
Overpeck, J. (2005). Arctic system on trajectory to new, seasonally ice-free state. Eos, 86.34 (2005): 309-312.
Parkinson, C. (2002). A 21 year record of Arctic sea-ice areas and their regional, seasonal and monthly variability and trends. Annals of Glaciology, 34.1 (2002): 441-446.
RESPONSIVENESS OF POLAR SEA ICE AREA TO AIR TEMPERATURE 1979-2016, JAMAL MUNSHI, 2016 18
Parkinson-Comiso, Z. (1983). Variability of Antarctic Sea ice: and changes in carbon dioxide. Science, 220.4601 (1983): 1005-1012.
Perovich, D. (2007). Increasing solar heating of the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas, 1979–2005: Attribution and role in the ice‐albedo feedback. Geophysical Research Letters, 34.19 (2007).
Prodobnik, B. (2008). Detrended cross correlation analysis. Physical Review Letters, 100: 084102.
REMSS. (2016). MSU Monthly time series. Retrieved 2016, from remss.com: ftp://ftp.remss.com/msu/monthly_time_series/
Serreze, M. (2007). Perspectives on the Arctic’s shrinking sea-ice cover. Science, 315.5818 (2007): 1533-1536.
Serreze, M. (2011). Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: A research synthesis. Global and Planetary Change, 77.1 (2011): 85-96.
Siegfried, T. (2010). Odds Are, It’s Wrong. Retrieved 2016, from Science News: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/odds-are-its-wrong
Vidal, J. (2016). Arctic sea ice cover set to be second lowest ever recorded, data suggests. Retrieved 2016, from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/14/arctic-sea-ice-cover-set-to-be-second-lowest-ever-recorded-data-suggests
Vinje, T. (2001). Anomalies and trends of sea-ice area and atmospheric circulation in the Nordic Seas during the period 1864-1998. Journal of Climate, 14.3 (2001): 255-267.
Wang-Overland. (2009). A sea ice free summer Arctic within 30 years? Geophysical research letters, 36.7 (2009).
Wang-Overland. (2012). A sea ice free summer Arctic within 30 years: An update from CMIP5 models. Geophysical Research Letters, 39.18 (2012).
Wang-Overland. (2013). When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? Geophysical Research Letters, 40.10 (2013): 2097-2101.
William, K. (1997). Abrupt mid-twentieth-century decline in Antarctic sea-ice area from whaling records. Nature, 389.6646 (1997): 57-60.
Winton, M. (2006). Does the Arctic sea ice have a tipping point? Geophysical Research Letters, 33.23 (2006).
Yuan, X. (2000). Antarctic sea ice area variability and its global connectivity. Journal of Climate, 13.10 (2000): 1697-1717.
RELATED POSTS
The Anomalies in Temperature Anomalies
The Greenhouse Effect of Atmospheric CO2
ECS: Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity
TCR: Transient Climate Response
Peer Review of Climate Research: A Case Study
Spurious Correlations in Climate Science
Global Warming and Arctic Sea Ice: A Bibliography
Global Warming and Arctic Sea Ice: A Bibliography
Carbon Cycle Measurement Problems Solved with Circular Reasoning
NASA Evidence of Human Caused Climate Change
Event Attribution Science: A Case Study
Event Attribution Case Study Citations
Global Warming Trends in Daily Station Data
History of the Global Warming Scare
The dearth of scientific knowledge only adds to the alarm
Nonlinear Dynamics: Is Climate Chaotic?
Eco-Fearology in the Anthropocene
Carl Wunsch Assessment of Climate Science: 2010
Gerald Marsh, A Theory of Ice Ages
History of the Ozone Depletion Scare
Empirical Test of Ozone Depletion
Brewer-Dobson Circulation Bibliography
Elevated CO2 and Crop Chemistry
Little Ice Age Climatology: A Bibliography
Sorcery Killings, Witch Hunts, & Climate Action
Climate Impact of the Kuwait Oil Fires: A Bibliography
Noctilucent Clouds: A Bibliography
Climate Change Denial Research: 2001-2018
Climate Change Impacts Research
36 Responses to "Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice?"

[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice? Climate Impact of the Kuwait Oil Fires: A Bibliography […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


[…] Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2018 […]


If I remember correctly, there is a very high correlation between arctic sea ice and the phenomenon known as the precession of the perihelion. I did not see any mention of this in the references.


[…] RELATED POST: Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice? […]


[…] RELATED POST: Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice? […]


[…] Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice? […]


[…] Does Global Warming Drive Changes in Arctic Sea Ice? […]


[…] Both the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice has declined rapidly over the last several decades. Sea ice decline is also normal in interglacials. Human cause is not necessary to explain such phenomena in interglacials. A notable issue with sea ice in this interglacial is the difference between the Arctic where summer sea ice is declining and the Antarctic where it is not. This difference may imply a role for other causes of sea ice decline in the Arctic not considered or studied because of the obsession with human caused climate change. This issue is discussed more fully in a related post [LINK] . […]


[…] Perhaps the clearest evidence of fear based activism in climate science is the oft repeated pattern in which first a “tipping point” is declared. The declaration is quickly followed by its retraction with the statement that “there is still time” if we act quickly and decisively to limit or eliminate our use of fossil fuels. Some examples of these tipping point declarations are cited in a related post [LINK] . The pattern likely derives from a failure of climate science, at a given level of fear, to convince consumers that they should not be using fossil fuels. That requires a gradual escalation of the level of fear such that at some point the fear level is escalated to the tipping point which implies that the deed is done, that the planet is toast, and that there is nothing we can do to stop the horrors about to transpire. Soon after the declaration of the tipping point fear, however, climate science realizes that it has been overdone since it is now impossible for them to use the fear for activism against fossil fuels. “Tipping point” implies that no corrective action can be taken. Thus, soon thereafter, the “but there is still time” statement is issued. This statement is nonsensical because it is inconsistent with the very concept of tipping point. Yet this “tipping point – there is still time” cycle has been played out a number of times [LINK] . A specific example of the tipping point cycles is the case of sea ice extent in the Arctic that has been used as a high profile fear factor since at least the 1990s as shown in a related post [LINK] with climate scientists closely tracking year to year changes in the September minimum Arctic sea ice extent and raising an alarm of impending doom when a low sea ice extent is observed. The most intense of these tipping point alarm was raised in 2007 when it was declared that “The Arctic is Screaming” [LINK] . These alarms were raised with the assumption that the observed changes in Arctic sea ice extent were caused by fossil fuel emissions by way of global warming and could be moderated by reducing or eliminating the use of fossil fuels. However, not empirical evidence has ever been presented to establish that relationship possibly because none exists (as shown in a related post [LINK] ). […]


[…] are shown for the period 1979-2018 in related posts at this site for the Arctic and the Antarctic [ARCTIC SEA ICE LINK] [ANTARCTIC SEA ICE LINK] . These complex trends make it clear that the data posted by Popular […]


[…] with the assumption but not the evidence that these changes in sea ice extent are driven by AGW [LINK] and its repeated attempt to raise an alarm about changes in Antarctic sea ice extent are not […]


[…] EXAMPLE 7: Arctic sea ice extent has played an important role in climate change fear based activism because of periods of diminishing summer minimum sea ice extent in September and the forecasts of “ice free Arctic” that these trends have engendered. The underlying fear of human caused climate change causing Arctic sea ice melt was thus created. The evidence for the causal connection for this causation is a correlation between the rate of warming and the rate of summer sea ice decline; but detrended correlation analysis shows that this correlation is spurious as no year to year responsiveness of September Arctic sea ice extent to the rate of warming is found in the detrended series [LINK] . […]


[…] A RELATED POST ON THIS SITE PRESENTS FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT THE OBSERVED SEA ICE MELT IN THE ARCTIC CANNOT BE EXPLAINED IN TERMS OF ATMOSPHERIC PHENOMENA ONLY [LINK] . […]


[…] Results of regression analysis appear in Figure 4. A statistically significant relationship is not indicated in the results. We conclude from the above analysis that sea ice extent is not responsive to temperature. This result is consistent with prior studies of sea ice reported in related posts on Antarctic sea ice [LINK] as well as Arctic sea ice extent [LINK] . […]


[…] [RELATED POST: ARCTIC SEA ICE] […]


[…] SMSIE does not show that that SMSIE is responsive to changes in AGW surface temperature [LINK] [LINK] . The single-minded obsession of climate science with fossil fuel emissions [LINK] makes it […]


[…] SEA ICE POSTS: [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] […]


[…] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] […]


Millions and millions of words by thousands and thousands of so called academics without anyone once mentioning the most obvious of all natural phenomena — supply of new precipitation or the lack thereof.
The continental ice sheets did not melt away because it was getting warmer. They melted away because of a reduction of winter precipitation caused by Global Cooling.
Less heat means less water vapor and less precipitation.

1 | Antarctic Sea Ice: 1979-2018 | Cha-am Jamal, Thailand
August 9, 2018 at 9:39 am
[…] RELATED: ARCTIC SEA ICE 1979-2018 […]