Thongchai Thailand

About

[LIST OF POSTS ON THIS SITE]

 

The Present:

Enjoying retirement on golf courses and with golf friends.

 

 

 

 

 

The Past:

Chemical Engineer, AIChE

Tenneco Chemicals, Bechtel Corporation, Sonoma State University

PhD University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

Research in applied statistics

 

 

 

[LIST OF POSTS ON THIS SITE]

 

 

 

 

 

15 Responses to "About"

Dear Jamal sir

I came across your older site and the wbt section in it. It was wonderful.
I read and researched on it a lot.

The most amazing thing i found (among others!!) was the one in which the man disappears from a bar in south Africa and appears in Utah in USA. I would like to have that reference/link which is valid (brad steiger is written) The fact is titled “loopholes in space?”

I would love it if you helped me through this!

Please sir, if you have time, reply to me with the info.

with regards
Ajay

sorry sir but the web service that hosted the document has gone out of business and the page has disappeared. Here are some kind people who have tried to preserve some of that very fine list.

https://www.catalase.com/weird.htm
https://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/dishones.htm
http://www.soulwise.net/47weird.htm

i recall that this note had appeared in my weird-but-true page about a decade ago. the reference is of course brad steiger. his home page is
http://www.bradandsherry.com/
hope this helps.
thank you for your comment.
jamal

Thank you for helping awaken society to reality, indelibly recorded in exact rest masses of the ~3,000 types of atoms that comprise all matter: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Dawning_of_Truth.pdf

Jamal
I have watched with interest your contributions to the climate discussions. I am not a math person so appreciate you and others that can parse the convoluted data sets.
Do you have the ability to check the math in:
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/new-insights-on-the-physical-nature-of-the-atmospheric-greenhouse-effect-deduced-from-an-empirical-planetary-temperature-model.pdf
It would truly be transformative if it is right.
Thank you.

I will take a look. Thanks.

A proof of the greenhouse effect of co2 was put forth by climate scientists in terms of the difference in surface temp among the planets. Ned shows that these differences can be explained in terms of pv=nrt and that therefore they do not serve as proof of the greenhouse effect of co2.

I have provided a more direct proof. I showed that the equilibrium climate sensitivity depends on a spurious correlation. Please my posts labeled as ecs and as spurious correlations in climate science.

Hallo Jamal,
Greetings from Germany. Greenhouse effect is mainly driven by water wapor. So the only focus on CO2 is Quatsch! Climate is driven mostly from decadal ocean oscillation and other sources (sun) So far, there is no way to predict the climate.
sincerely marty

Brief and powerful message from Germany. Thank you Marty. Danke.

https://chaamjamal.wordpress.com/2018/05/27/spurious-correlations-in-climate-science-2/

Thank you for this post. I am currently discussing this as a larger discussion on climate change and my friend has stated:
“The lack of short-term relationships is absolutely irrelevant to the concerns climate advocates have over long-term effects of human emissions.”
He seems adamant that the lack of correlation on annual or even decadal timescale is not enough to discount future catastrophe caused by our emissions. I cannot see the validity of his position.

Perhaps it is based in the TCR idea based on the proportionality of temperature with cumulative emissions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: