A QUORA QUESTION BY ANTHONY GILL
Posted February 13, 2022
on:
QUESTION
WHAT IN YOUR OPINION OR INFORMED RESEARCH ARE THE BIGGEST BARRIERS TO A WORLD FREE OF FOSSIL FUEL OR CARBON BASED DEPENDENCY FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION?
MY ANSWER
IN MY OPINION, THE BIGGEST BARRIER TO A WORLD FREE OF FOSSIL FUEL WITH NO CARBON BASED DEPENDENCY FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION IS THAT THE ARGUMENT PRESENTED BY CLIMATE SCIENCE TO PROPOSE THESE CONDITIONS FOR OUR ENERGY POLICY IS FATALLY FLAWED. FOR DETAILS PLEASE SEE :
LINK TO DETAILS: https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/11/18/tcre-transient-climate-response-to-cumulative-emissions/
THE NEED FOR A SUSTAINED AND EXTREME FORM OF ACTIVISM TO PUSH THIS ISSUE TO THE POINT OF CHILD ABUSE IS BEST UNDERSTOOD IN THIS CONTEXT WHEREIN THE WEAKER YOUR CASE THE STRONGER THE ACTIVISM NEEDS TO BE.


THANK YOU ANTHONY GILL FOR THIS VERY RELEVANT QUESTION

February 14, 2022 at 3:26 am
A WORLD FREE OF FOSSIL FUEL OR CARBON BASED DEPENDENCY FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION is a crime against humanity because more CO2 means more food at no additional cost for water and fertilizer for the entire world and it’s absolutely impossible for CO2 to accumulate in the atmosphere because:
The molecular weight of H2O is 18 (1×2+16×1)
The molecular weight of CO2 is 44 (1×12+16×2)
The molecular weight of Air is 14.3 (approximately)
You can see with your own eyes how air and water separate because water is 26% heavier than air, but you can’t see what happens to CO2 that is 208% heavier than air, can you?
If CO2 molecules weren’t heavier than water the diatoms, corals, shellfish, and mollusks at the bottom of the ocean would not be able produce the calciumCARBONate they need to grow their exoskeletons.
Less CO2 means fewer diatoms, corals, shellfish, and mollusks.
So, the entire question is based on the fact that the Global Elites that control the global media have convinced the majority of the population, that have little or no scientific training, that CO2 is a pollutant that needs to taxed.
The Global Elites have set up companies all around the world, run by friends and family, to funnel these billions of tax dollars to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere, when it’s physically impossible for CO2 to accumulate in the atmosphere, because of gravity.