Thongchai Thailand

Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle

Posted on: August 17, 2018

FIGURE 1: MEAN DECADAL SEASONAL CYCLE IN THE CET 1722-2016

seasonalcycle0820

 

FIGURE 2: TRENDS IN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUMMER AND WINTER

 

 

 

seascyletable

 

FIGURE 3: FULL SPAN OLS TREND FOR EACH CALENDAR MONTH

 

 

 

FIGURE 4: TREND PROFILE FOR EACH CALENDAR MONTH

PROFILEGIF

 

FIGURE 5: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FULL SPAN TREND & THE TREND PROFILE

TRENDPROFILE-ANALYSIS

 

 

[LIST OF POSTS ON THIS SITE]

 

  1. Temperature data taken at weather stations contain a diurnal cycle, a seasonal cycle, and random natural variations. Along with these they may also contain a long term trend over a period of many years. Typically, the diurnal and seasonal cycles represent more than 80-90% of the total variance in the actual temperature measurements. The remaining 10-20% or so consists mostly of unexplained random variations. In cases where a statistically significant trend is found with OLS linear regression, no more than a small portion of the variance, around 3% or so, can be ascribed to a long term warming or cooling trend.
  2. It is for these reasons that the study of global warming over many decades, regression coefficients for long term trends are relatively a very weak feature of the time series that must be teased out of the data net of the greater diurnal, seasonal, and random variations. The large seasonal cycle is removed from monthly mean temperature data by subtracting the corresponding temperature in a reference period. The temperature data thus deseasonalized are published as “temperature anomalies”. Global warming research is carried out with these data sets. This procedure contains the assumption that the seasonal cycle is constant and unchanging across the full span of the time series being studied.
  3. This study is an investigation of the validity of this assumption. Figure 1 is a graphical representation of the seasonal cycle. The seasonal cycle is represented as a plot of the decadal mean temperature for each calendar month from January (labeled as “1”) to December (labeled as “12”). The GIF image cycles through 25 decades of decadal mean seasonal cycles in the CET from 1772 to 2016. The display clearly shows that the shape of the seasonal cycle graphic changes over time and implies that the seasonal cycle is not constant across time. The changes may seem small and insignificant but they should be understood in relation to long term trends in temperature which are typically less than 5% of the diurnal range per century.
  4. The inconstancy of the seasonal cycle is confirmed in Figure 2 where long term trends in the differences in temperature among calendar months is presented. The results show that there are statistically significant long term trends in the temperature differences between summer months and winter months. This difference confirms that the seasonal cycle is changing as the climate warms and that the constancy of the seasonal cycle assumed in the construction of temperature anomalies is not valid.
  5. The reason for the differences in seasonal cycles seen in Figures 1&2 is presented in Figure 3.  It shows that when the long term trends are computed separately for each calendar month we find that the warming trend is stronger in the winter months than in the summer months. These differential trends imply a gradual narrowing of the the their temperature differences as for example between January and July as shown in Figure 2.
  6. Figure 4 is a GIF image that cycles through the twelve calendar months displaying the full span OLS linear trend for that calendar month as well as a graphic for a different approach to the study of temperature trends proposed in this work that we shall refer to as a Trend Profile. Rather than one full span OLS trend over the full sample of N observations, the Trend Profile tracks changes in temperature through the full span of the time series as a time series of temperature trends in a moving 30-year window. The window moves through the temperature time series one year at a time computing 30-year trends.
  7. The trend profiles in the GIF image of Figure 4 show that an observed full span warming trend is the net result of multiple 30-year warming and cooling trends with magnitudes that are more than an order of magnitude larger than the full span trends.
  8. A great variety of shapes are seen in the Trend Profiles of the twelve calendar months. We can also see in these images that the differences among the calendar months are much more intense and complex than just differences in the numerical values of the full span trend seen in Figure 3. The Trend Profile procedure provides a a great deal of more information. More insight is thus gained into the trend behavior of the time series into the differences among the calendar months.
  9. The relationship between the full span OLS trend and the Trend Profile is displayed in Figure 5. It shows that the mean of thee moving 30-year trends is a good and possibly more robust estimate for the overall full span trend and that this estimate is related the the ratio of warming and cooling trends as well as their magnitudes in the Trend Profile. In short, the argument is presented that the trend profile provides more information than a single OLS full span trend line.
  10. The temperature trend information presented and understood in terms of trend profiles for each calendar month contains more information and offers greater statistical validity and reliability than a single OLS trend line drawn through the deseasonalized temperatures for all twelve calendar months.
  11. In conclusion we find that the use of temperature anomalies that facilitates the combination of the deseasonalized temperatures for the twelve calendar months is an inadequate, erroneous, and unnecessary innovation and that temperature trends are best understood in terms of the twelve Trend Profiles for the twelve calendar months.

 

SOURCE DOCUMENT FULL TEXT

SERVER #1 SSRN.COM

SERVER #2 ACADEMIA.EDU

PROFILEGIF

 

[LIST OF POSTS ON THIS SITE]

25 Responses to "Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle"

[…] Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle […]

[…] The Anomalies in Temperature Anomalies […]

[…] The Anomalies in Temperature Anomalies […]

[…] The Anomalies in Temperature Anomalies […]

[…] of differences in warming trends among the calendar months reported in a related post at Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle  […]

[…] of the trend is presented in terms of a “trend profile” described in a related post [Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle].  These are trends in a moving 30-year window that moves one year at a time with the first window […]

[…] Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle […]

[…] Temperature Trend Profiles & the Seasonal Cycle […]

[…] differ and that their combination into an annual temperature risks losing that information   [LINK] . For each of four temperature reconstruction datasets and each of twelve calendar months we […]

[…] The time span for the study is 40 year satellite era from 1979 to 2018 when direct measurements of mean global lower troposphere temperatures are available. The other three temperature time series constrained to this sample period so that a direct comparison can be made. Eight calendar months (January to August) of data are available for the full sample period 1979-2018 at the time of this study. The calendar months are studied separately as their trend behaviors have been shown to differ in a related post at this site [LINK] […]

[…] severity. An alternative graphical display is a TREND PROFILE. It is described in a related post [LINK] as a plot of trends in a moving window that moves through the time series one year at a time. The […]

[…] post that the the behavior of temperatures in the calendar months contain significant differences [LINK] (2) A bias test is included because the standard deviation of σ=0.6 found in the reference study […]

[…] The study of long term temperature trends must therefore be carried out after the diurnal cycle and the seasonal cycle are removed from the data. The diurnal cycle can be removed by taking daily means or by studying either the daily maximum or daily minimum temperatures. The seasonal cycle can be removed by studying one calendar month at a time or by computing a de-seasonalized annual mean by using dummy variables to represent calendar months. Yet another method, and the one used by climate science, is to subtract temperatures in a reference period to compute what is referred to as “temperature anomalies”. A related post presents a critical evaluation of this procedure [LINK] . […]

[…] Uncertainties in global mean temperature estimation and and implications for trend uncertainty are studied by comparing four different temperature datasets, three temperature reconstructions from the instrumental record and one set of satellite microwave radiometry. They are identified with 3-letter acronyms as HAD (Hadley Center HadCRUT4), GIS (Goddard Institute of Space Studies), BRK (Berkeley Earth Climate Research), and UAH (University of Alabama Satellite data).  The common time span 1979-2018 is used for all four data sources restricted by data availability for UAH. The temperatures are delivered as deseasonalized temperature anomalies that should have no seasonal cycle remaining in the data. The analysis is carried out for each calendar month separately. In related posts at this site it is shown that trend behavior vary significantly among the calendar months [LINK] . […]

[…] This post is a critical evaluation of this line of reasoning. First, mean USA temperature cannot be expected to mimic global mean temperature because of large geographical differences and second, the time span of 15 years is too short for this kind of test as it has been shown in related posts that even strong warming trends do not show consistent monotonic warming year after year but rather that the long term trend is simply the net result of violent warming, cooling, and no trend cycles at decadal and multi-decadal time scales [LINK] [LINK] . […]

[…] continue until the warming is over. As shown in a related post on “trend profiles” [LINK] , long term warming trends are the the net result of decadal and multi-decadal cycles of warming […]

[…] to ignore it. It was cooler in 1750 than it was in 1850 {Related post: CET warming since 1771 [LINK] } . And some countries came in and said we’re going to use a 2005 […]

Leave a Reply to Eco-Fearology in the Anthropocene | Cha-am Jamal, Thailand Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: